NJ-Hugin internal (R): Menendez +2 (user search)

Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 33,320

Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Re: NJ-Hugin internal (R): Menendez +2

« on: October 19, 2018, 07:41:19 PM »

As expected. This is is a pipe dream for Hugin and the GOP.

Logged

Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 33,320

Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Re: NJ-Hugin internal (R): Menendez +2

« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2018, 07:45:28 PM »

Quote from: Deep Blue Montana on October 19, 2018, 07:44:53 PM

Quote from: Reasonable™ Moderate Republican on October 18, 2018, 12:19:55 PM

Imagine how much more we might know about the midterms if we all the time and energy spent polling and talking about NJ were directed at races with a greater than 0.1% chance of flipping, like MT, MO, IN, or FL.

lolwut?!

Anyway, this is obviously Safe D, and I’m not sure why some Republicans are getting their hopes up here.

It's their version of Texas/Tennessee.

Logged

Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 33,320

Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Re: NJ-Hugin internal (R): Menendez +2

« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2018, 07:51:52 PM »

Quote from: Deep Blue Montana on October 19, 2018, 07:50:56 PM

Quote from: Progressive Pessimist on October 19, 2018, 07:45:28 PM

It's their version of Texas/Tennessee.

Honestly, TX and TN are both more likely to flip than NJ, but that’s really not saying much. And the idea that a solid Democratic Clinton +14 state that hasn’t elected a Republican Senator since 1972 is as or even more likely to flip than a Trump +20 or Trump +42 state because of #candidatequality is ludicrous.

Agreed.

Logged

Pages: [1]

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 04, 2024, 09:34:09 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more