Poll about Mitt Romney

[Psychic Octopus]

Mitt Romney had greatness thrust upon him.

[Psychic Octopus]

THIS IS ROMNEY COUNTRY!

[Psychic Octopus]

it is a Perosanlity Cult. He is being worshipped as the Next Reagan.  Sigh...

[Psychic Octopus]

I hate Romney with every inch of my body. If he does win the Republican Nom in 2012, I will be voting 3rd party. Also, the south would be in play as well.

Oh please. The deep south will not be in play for Obama, and the idea that it will be is preposterous. And, but you in fact did vote for Obama, so I am sorry, but that isn't really a threat to Mitt.

Also, Huckabee is dead, True Conservative. His clemency scandal is worse then then Willie Horton. No, of course Romney isn't the nominee, but it seems almost inevitable. All of his potential rivals, outside of Pawlenty, have shot themselves in the foot.

[Psychic Octopus]

Also, Huckabee is dead, True Conservative. His clemency scandal is worse then then Willie Horton. No, of course Romney isn't the nominee, but it seems almost inevitable. All of his potential rivals, outside of Pawlenty, have shot themselves in the foot.

I'll vote for anyone over Romney. If stopping him means I must vote for Pawlenty, I'll do it.

You'd vote for Obama over Romney?

[Psychic Octopus]

Also, Huckabee is dead, True Conservative. His clemency scandal is worse then then Willie Horton. No, of course Romney isn't the nominee, but it seems almost inevitable. All of his potential rivals, outside of Pawlenty, have shot themselves in the foot.

I'll vote for anyone over Romney. If stopping him means I must vote for Pawlenty, I'll do it.

You'd vote for Obama over Romney?

No, in that case I would vote third party. But you probably do realize that I was referring to the Republican primary candidates, no?

Yes I noticed, it was just a question. Why would you vote third party, though? Voting third party is, after all, a waste of a vote. When it comes to the general election, it's basically a lesser of two evils choice.

[Psychic Octopus]

The 2008 election cycle, and Romney's defeat, were due to factors outside his control. Romney had to compete with everyone, McCain and Giuliani on his left, and Huckabee on his right. McCain and Huckabee, on the other hand, didn't have to compete for the same votes. Their voters were fundamentally different people. Romney, seeing these obstacles, did as should be expected.

2012, however, is another call. It's a brand new ball game. Romney has no one on his left, and can be counted on as being the heavyweight from that side of the party. Huckabee and Palin, however, are competing for the same voters. This is a crucial impediment to both of their campaigns, and seriously benefits Romney.

[Psychic Octopus]

. Someone respond to me.

[Psychic Octopus]

Gary Johnson is a good guy, but he has no chance of winning.

[Psychic Octopus]

Gary Johnson is a good guy, but he has no chance of winning.

Says who?

Says logic.

[Psychic Octopus]

Gary Johnson is a good guy, but he has no chance of winning.

Says who?

Says logic.

Really, logic predicts the outcome of the 2012 election?

Anyone with half a brain can realize that Gary Johnson won't win the GOP nomination. Anyone who thinks other wise is deluding themselves.

[Psychic Octopus]

Gary Johnson is a good guy, but he has no chance of winning.

Says who?

Says logic.

Really, logic predicts the outcome of the 2012 election?

Anyone with half a brain can realize that Gary Johnson won't win the GOP nomination. Anyone who thinks other wise is deluding themselves.

But those with a whole brain think otherwise.

Haha, that was funny.

I'd love to see Gary Johnson win, but it seems unlikely to me.