Canada's GST and the PC Party
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 06:34:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Canada's GST and the PC Party
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Canada's GST and the PC Party  (Read 1068 times)
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 04, 2005, 03:04:15 PM »

I didn't realize until reading an article on the CBC website today that perhaps the biggest thing that did in the PC Party in 1993 was its pushing through the  Goods and Services Tax.

http://www.cbc.ca/canadavotes/leadersparties/gst.html

Hopefully Hugh would have voted Conservative in that election Smiley

If it was so unpopular, and the Liberals were so pissed that Mulrooney appointed 8 extra Senators to make a Conservative majority in the Senate in order to get the GST passed, why did the Liberals never manage to get rid of it like they promised?

Could some of the Canadians shed some light on the subject?  I've always admired the old PC Party so I'm kinda interested in what caused its demise.
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,222


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2005, 03:12:48 PM »

If it was so unpopular, and the Liberals were so pissed that Mulrooney appointed 8 extra Senators to make a Conservative majority in the Senate in order to get the GST passed, why did the Liberals never manage to get rid of it like they promised?
Because they're stinkin' liars!!! They were totally capable of getting rid of it since they had a huge majority in the House.

Well, to put it less subjectively, Canada was facing a huge tsunami of red ink at the time, so it made sense to cutback and increase revenue. At the end we now have a big budget surplus and much of the public debt has been paid.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Many things. By 93 Mulroney had become unpopular for raising the GST, the state of the economy, his arrogance, and his cozing up to Reagan's White House. Knowing that an election had to come in 93 the PC made Kim Campbell their new leader and for a while she was popular for being a fresh face and the first woman leader of Canada.

During the campaign, she screwed up BIG TIME. She was soon seen as a protege of Mulroney and too inexperienced having only served at one cabnet post, then came several gaffes (e.g. at the debate  she said an election is not the time to talk about the issues), and finally, when everything looked bad for her, she made a TV ad criticising how Chretien's face looked ugly and how he wouldn't represent Canada well.

That was the final blow for her. Everyone knew the PC was going to be squashed, but no one thought about them only having two seats on election night!!
[/quote]
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2005, 03:16:08 PM »
« Edited: December 04, 2005, 03:36:21 PM by Emsworth »

I've always admired the old PC Party so I'm kinda interested in what caused its demise.
There were quite a few factors, but economics was probably the most important of them. In 1993, Canada was going through a very bad recession; unemployment was at the highest level since the Great Depression. Rightly or wrongly, the Tories were blamed for these problems.

Also, the rise of the BQ played an important role. Previously, Brian Mulroney managed to win the support of Quebec. However, after the failure of the Meech Lake Accord, Quebec sovereignty gained momentum. The Bloc was formed, and managed to destroy the PC Party in Quebec.

And finally, Kim Campbell was not exactly a very competent politician.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2005, 03:22:03 PM »

And finally, Kim Clark was not exactly a very competent politician.

Was that a Freudian slip? Smiley
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2005, 03:37:47 PM »

And finally, Kim Clark was not exactly a very competent politician.

Was that a Freudian slip? Smiley
Hmm, I was thinking of Joe Clark at the same time for some reason...
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2005, 12:23:56 AM »

There was the infamous "Chretien ad" too
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 10 queries.