Which philosopher has been your greatest influence? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 10:18:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Which philosopher has been your greatest influence? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Which philosopher has been your greatest influence?  (Read 4733 times)
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


« on: November 03, 2005, 03:49:28 PM »

Arthur Schopenhauer(general stuff), Hans Hermann Hoppe, Pierre Proudhon, Lysander Spooner(all 3 politics).
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2005, 04:32:44 PM »

No one, really; I form my opinions based on what seems correct to me given what I know and can reasonably infer.  I can't think of any one single philosopher whose ideas I have taken as one large whole and have held up as sacrosanct.
´

That's not the issue. One can be influenced by Ayn Rand, for instance, but still aknowledge she was a mean c**ntrag who made up individualist excuses for denying people their individuality and nuking those people(namely people who wear cloth in their heads and very much dislike Israel). Being influenced by someone is recognizing value in their ideas and using them to reformulate our tought, not follow everything philisophers say.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2005, 04:31:43 PM »

In rough order:

1. George Santayana

You don't believe that bunk about history repeating itself do you?

Anyway mine would be Locke, Paine and Mill probably, though I'd like to learn more about Nozick, I only know a small amount about his challenges to the work of Rawls.

All you need to know was that he was an idiot who thought all states evolved in the way he thought they should and used that as an argument against anarchy, when in fact there are few, if any, states that have evolved in the Nozickian manner.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2005, 03:15:13 AM »

I'm sorry to not be on the Ayn Rand/Milton Friedman train to neo-con land Cheesy



Roll Eyes Neo-cons are influenced by Trosky and social-democrats, not Friedman or Rand(except maybe Rand on foreign policy, though not even many neo-cons support nuking the middle east).
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2005, 01:50:20 PM »

I'm sorry to not be on the Ayn Rand/Milton Friedman train to neo-con land Cheesy



Roll Eyes Neo-cons are influenced by Trosky and social-democrats, not Friedman or Rand(except maybe Rand on foreign policy, though not even many neo-cons support nuking the middle east).

Once again I am foiled by my own stupidity.

If you meant Trotsky that would be really strange, since he was a communist, a different branch if I recall.

Ask John ford or Soulty, two neo-cons, and they'll tell you I'm right. Or I can find you a post by Ford where he says so:

Our roots are not in Zionism, but rather (as Bono has pointed out) Trotskyism.  We neoconservatives got our penchant for world revolution from the Trotskyists.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,703
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2007, 01:49:08 PM »
« Edited: February 28, 2007, 01:53:50 PM by Ship, the Magic Suffix »

bump

Augustine, Zeno of Citium, Calvin, Schopenhauer.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.