Two-thirds resolution (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 11:38:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Two-thirds resolution (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Two-thirds resolution (Passed)  (Read 2773 times)
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« on: February 15, 2015, 11:06:59 AM »
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
[/quote]

Okay with that?
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2015, 10:01:51 AM »
Neither do it. The problem is not that 7 is two thirds of 10. The problem is, if there are just 9 senators, if it's still two thirds of ten (7) or just two thirds of nine (6).

AYE
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2015, 10:06:46 AM »
Quote from: Mideast Senator windjammer on February 16, 2015, 10:04:16 AM
Quote from: Senator Cranberry on February 16, 2015, 10:01:51 AM
Neither do it. The problem is not that 7 is two thirds of 10. The problem is, if there are just 9 senators, if it's still two thirds of ten (7) or just two thirds of nine (6).
2/3 of the sitting senators, so 6.

If that version is passed, yes. With the current line in place, not so much.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2015, 11:27:46 AM »
Quote from: Mideast Senator windjammer on February 16, 2015, 12:07:11 PM
Well, that's probably the first time it's not me who has a problem with barrier language Tongue.

Trust me, that happens to me all the time. I usually play along and hope no one notices anything Tongue
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2015, 11:26:33 AM »
I would say we don't need that, as it already says "at least". In that hypothetical scenario of yours, 5 would be less than 2/3, so it would violate the "at least", so it would not be enough.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2015, 08:17:02 AM »
Oh oops, I did not see that.

I am sorry Cris, but I guess what this amendment says is already specified with the "at least", and for me personally such a long clause in brackets is not that aesthetically pleasing Tongue

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
[/quote]
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2015, 03:05:25 PM »
Yeah, if you want so.
I will withdraw my amendment.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2015, 08:24:36 AM »
Fine with me
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2015, 08:50:50 AM »
Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.