The 10 counties that have ALWAYS voted Republican (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 05:35:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  The 10 counties that have ALWAYS voted Republican (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The 10 counties that have ALWAYS voted Republican  (Read 12667 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,774
United Kingdom


« on: February 16, 2015, 11:59:09 AM »

Eastern Kentucky proper was a major coal mining district (one of the most important in the entire United States. What's left of the industry in the area now is a tiny shadow of what used to be there). With the exception of a couple of extremely remote counties it swung over en masse to the Democratic Party during the great United Mineworkers organisation drives in the 1930s. Southeastern Kentucky had a mining element but it was smaller and more casualised; the economy was instead dominated by subsistence agriculture. Unionisation efforts were not successful in the area and its voting patterns remind as solidly Republican as before. I thought this was well known, but apparently not.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,774
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2015, 10:47:17 AM »

What on earth is going on in this thread.

Slavery had nothing to do with anything in the eastern fifth of Kentucky; you couldn't have found a less suitable place for plantation agriculture anywhere in the South (however defined) had you tried; the whole area is part of the Cumberland Plateau. Pre-New Deal voting differences were mostly to do with ancestry; i.e. you found Democrats wherever Virginians had settled and so on. Afterwards it became a matter of class consciousness. Are we clear now?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,774
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2015, 12:12:31 PM »

What on earth is going on in this thread.

Slavery had nothing to do with anything in the eastern fifth of Kentucky; you couldn't have found a less suitable place for plantation agriculture anywhere in the South (however defined) had you tried; the whole area is part of the Cumberland Plateau. Pre-New Deal voting differences were mostly to do with ancestry; i.e. you found Democrats wherever Virginians had settled and so on. Afterwards it became a matter of class consciousness. Are we clear now?
You are a king of simplistic generalizations my friend. And that's coming from me.

Rude.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,774
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2015, 12:16:27 PM »

The Democratic regions of Eastern Kentucky are not where slavery was concentrated on that map!

Just imagine, for one moment, someone trying to run a plantation in that area... lol

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Actually the most Democratic areas (post New Deal/UMW) were well away from the Ohio River and up on the Plateau.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.