Path of Least Resistance to a Democratic House (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 12:28:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Path of Least Resistance to a Democratic House (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Path of Least Resistance to a Democratic House  (Read 2140 times)
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


« on: November 18, 2014, 10:13:20 PM »

Why AR 02? I understand UT 04, although I want to see if she becomes enough of a settled incumbent to win. At 37-38 seats, that would be enough for the Democrats to take 225 seats, and that list is pretty good otherwise.
Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2014, 12:24:47 AM »

Makes sense to me IceSpear.

Should Maine 02 be lower on the list? After all, Polinquin and his conservative challenger took 58% of the vote, with turnout at 86%. I find Maine 02 interesting given turnout and demographics.

I'd rank IL 10 much higher, it seems to fluctuate based on the year. Given 2016, Dold could lose again. It's outside Chicago in the ring counties, which trend liberal.

I'd be interested in the geographic concentration and demographic concentration of this list. As you said the Democratic decimation in Appalachia has made going back to a majority much harder.

NV 04 (Las Vegas-ish) makes sense.

FWIW, question. Should it be 31 seats assuming NE 01 goes back to the Republicans in 2016?

Overall, this is a good list.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.