Turnout-Based Electoral Apportionment (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 05:21:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  Turnout-Based Electoral Apportionment (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Turnout-Based Electoral Apportionment  (Read 2336 times)
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
« on: February 07, 2016, 08:30:36 PM »

If the number of electoral votes per state was based off of each state's voter turnout in the previous presidential election, the numbers for 2016 would be as follows (based off of 2012 results):


Biggest winner is Ohio (+3), while biggest losers are California and Texas (-9 each). The overall trend seems to be higher turnout in swing states and lower turnout in states with high Hispanic populations. The following map indicates which states gained or lost electoral votes due to the change:


Green >90% - Plus 3
Green >70% - Plus 2
Green >50% - Plus 1

Red >50% - Minus 1
Red >70% - Minus 3
Red >90% - Minus 9

If this map was somehow present for the 2012 election, Obama would have beaten Romney 341-197.

Thoughts?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.