Canada 2011 Official Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 06:37:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Canada 2011 Official Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 ... 48
Author Topic: Canada 2011 Official Thread  (Read 136050 times)
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #425 on: April 21, 2011, 10:53:46 PM »

Plus, Layton supposedly did well in the French-language debate, boosting the NDP's numbers in Quebec.  I didn't watch the French debate, but Iggy stunk in the English-language debate, in my opinion - he came across as entitled, impatient and surly.

Iggy had a few good lines: "you shut down everything you cannot control"; "this isn't bickering, this is democracy"; "you treat the Parliament like a little debating society that gets in your way", etc. But overall, he sounded exasperated and, you said it, impatient. I don't think he said anything meaningful about the Liberal policies all night.

Jack Layton, on the other hand, seems to have stealthily crafted his image over these past couple election cycles: building momentum in '06 and '08, not getting too worked up over the prorogation and "coalition with the seperatists" nonsense, looking more and more "ministerial" all the time. He's always struck me as a very shrewd guy, if somewhat bland.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #426 on: April 21, 2011, 10:56:49 PM »

If there was a turning point in the Liberal campaign, it's probably their decision to run this over-the-top ad.  The subtext of the ad basically states vote Liberal or Harper will kill you... flatline... which simply isn't believable - especially when the Liberals themselves were the last to cut federal health funding.   Not only that, but the original version of the ad claimed Harper said something that he never did - which has added more attention to it.  

It's no wonder that the polls are the way there are.  The Liberal campaign, which never seemed to have much of a coherent message to begin with, is collapsing.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #427 on: April 21, 2011, 10:57:42 PM »

Plus, Layton supposedly did well in the French-language debate, boosting the NDP's numbers in Quebec.  I didn't watch the French debate, but Iggy stunk in the English-language debate, in my opinion - he came across as entitled, impatient and surly.

Iggy had a few good lines: "you shut down everything you cannot control"; "this isn't bickering, this is democracy"; "you treat the Parliament like a little debating society that gets in your way", etc. But overall, he sounded exasperated and, you said it, impatient. I don't think he said anything meaningful about the Liberal policies all night.

Not to mention extraordinarily arrogant and entitled. I half expected him at one point to turn to Layton and say "take your little party and piss off."

Frankly, he may as well have.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #428 on: April 21, 2011, 11:28:12 PM »

So if the NDP manages to get more votes than the Libs... wtf happens?  I mean, that's gotta hurt.  Does Iggy get the second spot in the Kim Campbell Hall of Party Destruction?
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #429 on: April 21, 2011, 11:49:02 PM »

No.

Iggy did not lose, nor did Harper, Layton won. (at least so it seems atm)
Logged
Foucaulf
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,050
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #430 on: April 22, 2011, 12:57:22 AM »

If there was a turning point in the Liberal campaign, it's probably their decision to run this over-the-top ad.  The subtext of the ad basically states vote Liberal or Harper will kill you... flatline... which simply isn't believable - especially when the Liberals themselves were the last to cut federal health funding.   Not only that, but the original version of the ad claimed Harper said something that he never did - which has added more attention to it.  

It's no wonder that the polls are the way there are.  The Liberal campaign, which never seemed to have much of a coherent message to begin with, is collapsing.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Is Ignatieff really focusing his NDP attack on the guns issue? I thought the Liberal "soldiers with guns" ad back in 2006 taught them a lesson.

So if the NDP manages to get more votes than the Libs... wtf happens?  I mean, that's gotta hurt.  Does Iggy get the second spot in the Kim Campbell Hall of Party Destruction?

To be fair, Campbell only failed because she could not reverse her party's decline. And Turner's collapse is more numerically spectacular than the recent Liberal debacle.
The worst outcome is that the Liberals will be slowly squeezed out of government, both federal and provincial. It seems evident Ignatieff will not make sufficient gains federally, and it's likely the Ontario Liberal government will be kicked out of office. At that point, the only Liberal party in government will be the Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island, a province of 100000 people.
The Liberal brand has only survived because it is supposed to be a catch-all. A powerless Liberal administration, as feudal as it was in power, isn't worth much.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #431 on: April 22, 2011, 07:05:38 AM »
« Edited: April 22, 2011, 07:08:05 AM by Verily »

NDP up big again in Nanos, this time more from the Conservatives, though. NDP is at 26% in Quebec, behind the Bloc at 31% (18% Lib, 16% Con).

Conservative    37.8%    -1.2    
Liberal    26.1%    -0.6    
NDP    23.7%    +1.6    
BQ    7.4%    -0.1    
Green    3.5%    +0.1    

Interestingly, despite all of this, the NDP has not once polled at its 2008 level in Ontario in April (in Nanos). Currently at 16.5%, down from 18.2% in 2008.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #432 on: April 22, 2011, 07:16:09 AM »

The NDP's Quebec numbers are ahead of their Federal numbers (IE Quebec is brining the NDP up) while their Ontario numbers are below their Federal numbers (IE Ontario is bringing the NDP down)

This is quite an unusual state of affairs.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #433 on: April 22, 2011, 07:30:09 AM »

To be fair, the NDP really maxed out in the 2008 election in Ontario. What seats could they gain without a momentous gain in their direction? Kenora? I doubt is, we were in third. Oshawa? Yeah right... Davenport? Maybe... we're winning the sign war there. Beaches? Not without Marilyn Churley. Parkdale? Kennedy is invincible. York South-Weston? We need better numbers...
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #434 on: April 22, 2011, 09:29:47 AM »

So if the Liberals end up losing seats, would Iggy be out as leader? And if so who would take his place?
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,145


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #435 on: April 22, 2011, 10:31:48 AM »

Given that things aren't that different outside Quebec from the pre-election polls, I wouldn't look to English ads or the English debate as the main cause of the issue.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #436 on: April 22, 2011, 12:09:12 PM »

Does Harper really think his pledge to not govern from second place will gain him any seats? (link - CBC)  I can't seriously see a Liberal/NDP coalition (or an NDP/Liberal coalition if the NDP get a miraculous second place) as neither party would be amenable to that.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #437 on: April 22, 2011, 02:56:30 PM »

Does Harper really think his pledge to not govern from second place will gain him any seats? (link - CBC)  I can't seriously see a Liberal/NDP coalition (or an NDP/Liberal coalition if the NDP get a miraculous second place) as neither party would be amenable to that.

What's the point of forcing an election, then?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,988


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #438 on: April 22, 2011, 04:04:58 PM »

Apparently the Tories are scared of the NDP now: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PYTd52pT28&feature=youtu.be
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #439 on: April 22, 2011, 04:57:48 PM »

Does Harper really think his pledge to not govern from second place will gain him any seats? (link - CBC)  I can't seriously see a Liberal/NDP coalition (or an NDP/Liberal coalition if the NDP get a miraculous second place) as neither party would be amenable to that.

What's the point of forcing an election, then?

Obviously Iggy thought things would go differently once the campaign started.  Also, 2012 in general will likely be a better election environment for incumbents than right now is.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #440 on: April 22, 2011, 05:07:07 PM »

Does Harper really think his pledge to not govern from second place will gain him any seats? (link - CBC)  I can't seriously see a Liberal/NDP coalition (or an NDP/Liberal coalition if the NDP get a miraculous second place) as neither party would be amenable to that.

What's the point of forcing an election, then?

Obviously Iggy thought things would go differently once the campaign started.  Also, 2012 in general will likely be a better election environment for incumbents than right now is.

Canada's census was taken this year.  By 2012, there will be a reapportionment, which will undoubtedly add seats in the west.  That also needed to be taken into account.
Logged
Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese
JOHN91043353
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,572
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #441 on: April 22, 2011, 05:27:34 PM »

Is it just me, or do most Canadian political ads seem more like parodies of ads rather than actual ads?
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #442 on: April 22, 2011, 06:38:29 PM »

Those attacks on Jack layton seem a bit like what the UK parties tried to do to Nick Clegg during the Cleggmania of the debates. Once the momentum's started, it doesn't work.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #443 on: April 22, 2011, 07:38:58 PM »

Does Harper really think his pledge to not govern from second place will gain him any seats? (link - CBC)  I can't seriously see a Liberal/NDP coalition (or an NDP/Liberal coalition if the NDP get a miraculous second place) as neither party would be amenable to that.

What's the point of forcing an election, then?

Obviously Iggy thought things would go differently once the campaign started.  Also, 2012 in general will likely be a better election environment for incumbents than right now is.

Canada's census was taken this year.  By 2012, there will be a reapportionment, which will undoubtedly add seats in the west.  That also needed to be taken into account.

Will be. Not was.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #444 on: April 22, 2011, 07:42:05 PM »

It usually takes them 3 years to re-adjust the boundaries from the date of the start of the Census.

2004, 1994, 1984, 1974, 1964 IIRC are the most recent dates.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,807
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #445 on: April 22, 2011, 07:43:31 PM »

Will Canada's weird laws on election coverage affect us at all?
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #446 on: April 22, 2011, 07:53:23 PM »

Those attacks on Jack layton seem a bit like what the UK parties tried to do to Nick Clegg during the Cleggmania of the debates. Once the momentum's started, it doesn't work.

It worked during Palinmania (which had McCain leading Michigan at its height).
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #447 on: April 22, 2011, 07:58:30 PM »

Those attacks on Jack layton seem a bit like what the UK parties tried to do to Nick Clegg during the Cleggmania of the debates. Once the momentum's started, it doesn't work.

It worked during Palinmania (which had McCain leading Michigan at its height).

Like most things you post, I don't think the two things are even remotely comparable. And besides, Palin was sort of deflating on her own more and more. The more people heard from her, the less they liked her. Layton is kind of the opposite, in a way.
Logged
homelycooking
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,302
Belize


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #448 on: April 22, 2011, 08:12:37 PM »

Do the Tories have anything to say about the other parties besides the "they're seperatist enablers" nonsense? And does this actually play well out West or in Ontario?
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #449 on: April 22, 2011, 08:18:59 PM »

Do the Tories have anything to say about the other parties besides the "they're seperatist enablers" nonsense? And does this actually play well out West or in Ontario?

Well, they call the Liberals bumbling idiots. But so does everyone else, and it's true.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 ... 48  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 8 queries.