Post random maps here (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 03, 2024, 04:20:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here (search mode)
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 997498 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #200 on: August 18, 2010, 01:11:42 PM »



The colors do not represent the parties.

Number of times a State voted for a third party since 1912 (green=1, blue=2, red=3).
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #201 on: August 20, 2010, 09:33:52 AM »

Do colors represent parties ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #202 on: August 20, 2010, 10:01:46 AM »

Something to do with 2008 republican and/or democratic primaries ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #203 on: August 20, 2010, 11:51:06 AM »

Yes, both.  Can you figure out what exactly it has to do with them?

Red : Obama won in primary and/or McCain lost.
Blue : Obama lost and/or McCain won.

In case both won or lost, the results of the General eleciton determine the color.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #204 on: August 29, 2010, 05:49:38 AM »

Can you figure this one ?

Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #205 on: August 31, 2010, 04:10:47 AM »


Indeed, but what ? Wink
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #206 on: September 01, 2010, 03:48:12 AM »


No, in this case TX and NY would make no sense.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #207 on: September 01, 2010, 01:47:27 PM »

You're both wrong; A hint : shades represent normal Atlas percentages (ie in this case from 20% to 40%).
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #208 on: September 11, 2010, 01:57:15 AM »

Don't forget mine.

Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #209 on: September 19, 2010, 04:16:28 AM »

Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #210 on: September 20, 2010, 10:34:15 AM »


No. That's 2004 indeed, with red representing a certain percentage for democrats and blue a certain percentage for republicans. The shades have the same meaning they have on the Atlas.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #211 on: September 23, 2010, 02:53:46 AM »


No. That's 2004 indeed, with red representing a certain percentage for democrats and blue a certain percentage for republicans. The shades have the same meaning they have on the Atlas.

Hmmm...Is it the percent that each candidate won the sate by? So if Kerry got 40% of the vote & bush got 50% of the vote it would be Blue >10%?

No way, look at NY and Wisconsin.

Try to look at which States have the 20% shades and which have the 40%. What distinguishes them ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #212 on: September 26, 2010, 02:41:45 AM »

The Senate's composition after the 2008 elections. Come on, this one was just too simple ! Tongue
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #213 on: September 27, 2010, 09:30:37 AM »

The Senate's composition after the 2008 elections. Come on, this one was just too simple ! Tongue
yes but there's just a little more to it than that.

Sanders and Lieberman being counted as democrats ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #214 on: September 27, 2010, 02:20:40 PM »

The Senate's composition after the 2008 elections. Come on, this one was just too simple ! Tongue
yes but there's just a little more to it than that.

Sanders and Lieberman being counted as democrats ?
yes I did that, but that's not the point.

do you want a hint?

Yeah, I'd like. Wink
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #215 on: September 28, 2010, 04:50:18 AM »

Oh, I get it. For each State, the percentage got in the 2008 Presidential by the candidate of the Senators' party (when the State is split, it's the best of the two percentages).
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #216 on: September 28, 2010, 05:32:41 AM »


No. That's 2004 indeed, with red representing a certain percentage for democrats and blue a certain percentage for republicans. The shades have the same meaning they have on the Atlas.

Hmmm...Is it the percent that each candidate won the sate by? So if Kerry got 40% of the vote & bush got 50% of the vote it would be Blue >10%?

No way, look at NY and Wisconsin.

Try to look at which States have the 20% shades and which have the 40%. What distinguishes them ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #217 on: October 06, 2010, 02:02:58 AM »


No. That's 2004 indeed, with red representing a certain percentage for democrats and blue a certain percentage for republicans. The shades have the same meaning they have on the Atlas.

Hmmm...Is it the percent that each candidate won the sate by? So if Kerry got 40% of the vote & bush got 50% of the vote it would be Blue >10%?

No way, look at NY and Wisconsin.

Try to look at which States have the 20% shades and which have the 40%. What distinguishes them ?
They all have large hispanic minority populations, right?

Oh yeah, it's true. I didn't notice it...

Actually, this is not directly related with my map, but I think this may help you to find what it represents. What's one of the main characteristics of hispanics and other minorities in the way they vote ?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #218 on: October 06, 2010, 02:39:53 PM »


No. That's 2004 indeed, with red representing a certain percentage for democrats and blue a certain percentage for republicans. The shades have the same meaning they have on the Atlas.

Hmmm...Is it the percent that each candidate won the sate by? So if Kerry got 40% of the vote & bush got 50% of the vote it would be Blue >10%?

No way, look at NY and Wisconsin.

Try to look at which States have the 20% shades and which have the 40%. What distinguishes them ?
They all have large hispanic minority populations, right?

Oh yeah, it's true. I didn't notice it...

Actually, this is not directly related with my map, but I think this may help you to find what it represents. What's one of the main characteristics of hispanics and other minorities in the way they vote ?

Does it have to do with voter turnout?

Yeah, finally someone got it ! Smiley

That's right indeed. You can tell me what it shows exactly, even if it's pretty evident now. Wink
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #219 on: October 06, 2010, 04:30:56 PM »

Does it have to do with turnout among registered Republicans/Democrats in each state?

Nah, that's simpler. Wink
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #220 on: October 07, 2010, 03:24:01 AM »

Is it the voter turnout of minorities in various states, with lighter colors meaning lower turnout amongst those demographics?

Simpler...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #221 on: October 18, 2010, 09:01:36 AM »


Oh c'mon, that's too easy !

Dark red : Kennedy/Humphrey/McGovern
Red : Kennedy/Humphrey/Nixon
Light blue : Kennedy/Nixon/Nixon or Nixon/Humphrey/Nixon
Dark blue : Nixon/Nixon/Nixon
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #222 on: October 25, 2010, 08:27:44 AM »


1992 election giving X% of Bush votes to Perot.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #223 on: November 07, 2010, 06:49:45 AM »



After Ohio going GOP in 2010, scenario in which Obama wins the presidency in 2012.

This map is actually extremely important, because it is exactly how a tied election between Obama and McCain would have turned out in 2008.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #224 on: November 07, 2010, 04:04:50 PM »



After Ohio going GOP in 2010, scenario in which Obama wins the presidency in 2012.

This map is actually extremely important, because it is exactly how a tied election between Obama and McCain would have turned out in 2008.

wouldn't obama have carried virginia??

No, he'd lose it by 0.96 pts. It surprised me too. Wink
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.078 seconds with 11 queries.