Incumbents often do better than final polls (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 10:42:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Incumbents often do better than final polls (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Incumbents often do better than final polls  (Read 916 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,817


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: October 27, 2012, 07:33:58 PM »

There are definitely some examples, FDR 1936, Truman 1948, Bennet and Reid 2010, Lisa Murkowski both times.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,817


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2012, 10:34:15 PM »

There are definitely some examples, FDR 1936, Truman 1948, Bennet and Reid 2010, Lisa Murkowski both times.

I wouldn't use 1936, where it was one poll, done by mail and that had sample problems, and 1948, when everyone stopped polling a few weeks prior to the election.  

Gallup actually correctly called 1936.  

Gallup was way too pro-Landon, even though it was much better than Literary Digest.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.