US with Indian constituencies

[Хahar 🤔]

State: number of seats (average size)

California: 15 (25,36,095)
Texas: 10 (26,05,920)
New York: 8 (24,46,283)
Florida: 8 (24,14,696)
Illinois: 5 (25,75,051)
Pennsylvania: 5 (25,52,707)
Ohio: 5 (23,08,845)
Georgia: 4 (24,79,986)
Michigan: 4 (24,70,840)
North Carolina: 4 (24,38,018)
New Jersey: 3 (29,54,863)
Virginia: 3 (27,28,622)
Washington: 3 (22,99,004)
Massachusetts: 3 (22,15,381)
Arizona: 3 (21,84,418)
Indiana: 3 (21,79,111)
Tennessee: 3 (21,52,081)
Missouri: 2 (30,10,994)
Maryland: 2 (29,42,282)
Wisconsin: 2 (28,63,199)
Minnesota: 2 (26,89,570)
Colorado: 2 (25,93,791)
Alabama: 2 (24,11,012)
South Carolina: 2 (23,61,862)
Louisiana: 2 (23,00,947)
Kentucky: 2 (21,90,208)
Oregon: 2 (19,49,677)
Oklahoma: 2 (19,07,410)
Connecticut: 1 (35,90,347)
Iowa: 1 (30,74,186)
Mississippi: 1 (29,84,926)
Arkansas: 1 (29,49,131)
Kansas: 1 (28,85,905)
Utah: 1 (28,55,287)
Nevada: 1 (27,58,931)
New Mexico: 1 (20,85,538)
Nebraska: 1 (18,55,525)
West Virginia: 1 (18,55,413)
Idaho: 1 (15,95,728)
Hawaii: 1 (13,92,313)
Maine: 1 (13,29,192)
New Hampshire: 1 (13,20,718)
Rhode Island: 1 (10,50,292)
Montana: 1 (10,05,141)
Delaware: 1 (9,17,092)
South Dakota: 1 (8,33,354)
Alaska: 1 (7,31,449)
North Dakota: 1 (6,99,628)
Vermont: 1 (6,26,011)
Wyoming: 1 (5,76,412)

[Хahar 🤔]

I wouldn't think that Indian constituencies would worry about equality as much as the US does. The likely consequence on these maps would be no split counties at all.

As Lewis mentioned, Indian constituencies are also made of several state constituencies grouped together, which would produce interesting results in America.

[Хahar 🤔]

The Salinas-Palmdale district is unfortunate, but beyond that it's a very good map. I was playing around with this earlier (without making a full map because, you know, California) and I opted to split the far north along the Coast Ranges, since coastal and inland areas there are very different culturally (and politically) and are also not well-connected by road. The result was a district stretching from the Oregon border down to the Bay Area; I had no problem with this, since Arcata and San Francisco instinctively feel like they could be in the same district, but others might. The other northern district would take in some more of the Sacramento area and probably still remain Lean R, since the areas it took in couldn't be more D than the northern coast.