We have to have vetting-don't Democrats get it? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 12:45:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  We have to have vetting-don't Democrats get it? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: We have to have vetting-don't Democrats get it?  (Read 1137 times)
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« on: January 29, 2017, 03:16:23 AM »

A better solution if there is a legitimate terror threat is to process potential refugees through territories such as guam

You can't just shuffle people around like cattle.  If you expect these people to integrate into the American community, detaining them in Guam is not going to be helpful.
Refugees by definition intend to go back to their country of origin once the conflict is over, they are not immigrants. We can protect and take care of refugees while still keeping track of them

What happens when the refugees enjoy living in a 1st world country and don't want to go back to a war zone?
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2017, 01:06:47 PM »

This whole idea of temporarily restricting processing of refugees from certain countries is a racist idea stolen from that white nationalist figure Barack H. Obama:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

There was a flaw in the vetting process, it was fixed, the Iraqi ban was overturned. Not remotely the same.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 11 queries.