Ohio leg. passes 6-week abortion ban - VETOED by Kasich; 20-week bill signed
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 05:06:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Ohio leg. passes 6-week abortion ban - VETOED by Kasich; 20-week bill signed
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
Author Topic: Ohio leg. passes 6-week abortion ban - VETOED by Kasich; 20-week bill signed  (Read 6050 times)
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,432
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #75 on: December 13, 2016, 04:16:56 PM »

Vetoed the Heartbeat Bill, signed the harsher 20-week ban.  About what I expected...
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #76 on: December 13, 2016, 04:38:31 PM »

Vetoed the Heartbeat Bill, signed the harsher 20-week ban.  About what I expected...
The Heartbeat Bill is a lot harsher than the 20-week ban.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #77 on: December 13, 2016, 04:45:02 PM »

if you can't do it in super-red-redistan, you can't do it in OH.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,774


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #78 on: December 13, 2016, 05:21:58 PM »

He will join Mary Fallin in the history books of people who claimed to be pro-life, but passed on their chance to be the one to get Roe overturned.  Sad!
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,989


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #79 on: December 13, 2016, 05:31:12 PM »

Great news! Kasich would have crushed Hillary in a landslide.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,432
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #80 on: December 13, 2016, 05:37:44 PM »

Vetoed the Heartbeat Bill, signed the harsher 20-week ban.  About what I expected...
The Heartbeat Bill is a lot harsher than the 20-week ban.

Sorry, I meant the 20-week ban is more restrictive than the one currently in place.  The original law only required a viability check at 20 weeks, whereas the bill Kasich signed limits abortion at 20 weeks outright.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,133


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #81 on: December 13, 2016, 07:46:52 PM »

He will join Mary Fallin in the history books of people who claimed to be pro-life, but passed on their chance to be the one to get Roe overturned.  Sad!

This is a pro life bill, why sign something you know is going to be overturned in court. Its just a waste of time and money.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,876
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #82 on: December 13, 2016, 07:58:11 PM »

He will join Mary Fallin in the history books of people who claimed to be pro-life, but passed on their chance to be the one to get Roe overturned.  Sad!

This needed to be vetoed for strategic reasons. The challenge to Roe can't succeed when there is still a pro-choice majority on the Supreme Court.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #83 on: December 13, 2016, 07:59:57 PM »

He will join Mary Fallin in the history books of people who claimed to be pro-life, but passed on their chance to be the one to get Roe overturned.  Sad!

This needed to be vetoed for strategic reasons. The challenge to Roe can't succeed when there is still a pro-choice majority on the Supreme Court.

By the time it comes to them, they might have went from 5-3 to 4-5.
Logged
Mike67
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 396
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #84 on: December 13, 2016, 08:00:43 PM »

Great move by Ohio I agree with it wholeheartedly
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,876
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #85 on: December 13, 2016, 08:08:45 PM »

He will join Mary Fallin in the history books of people who claimed to be pro-life, but passed on their chance to be the one to get Roe overturned.  Sad!

This needed to be vetoed for strategic reasons. The challenge to Roe can't succeed when there is still a pro-choice majority on the Supreme Court.

By the time it comes to them, they might have went from 5-3 to 4-5.

I would prefer not placing any bets on judicial retirement.
Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #86 on: December 13, 2016, 08:52:54 PM »

Kennedy's expressed a desire to be replaced by a GOP Presidency.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #87 on: December 13, 2016, 08:59:25 PM »

This bill doesn't even have a life of the mother exception to it. Yikes!
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #88 on: December 13, 2016, 11:10:03 PM »

This bill doesn't even have a life of the mother exception to it. Yikes!

The war on women continues.
Logged
Mike67
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 396
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #89 on: December 13, 2016, 11:18:50 PM »

This bill doesn't even have a life of the mother exception to it. Yikes!

I'm Pro-Life and i'm against Abortion with no exceptions.
Logged
MarkD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,240
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #90 on: December 13, 2016, 11:20:11 PM »
« Edited: December 13, 2016, 11:40:41 PM by MarkD »

He will join Mary Fallin in the history books of people who claimed to be pro-life, but passed on their chance to be the one to get Roe overturned.  Sad!

This needed to be vetoed for strategic reasons. The challenge to Roe can't succeed when there is still a pro-choice majority on the Supreme Court.

By the time it comes to them, they might have went from 5-3 to 4-5.

I would prefer not placing any bets on judicial retirement.
Don't rely on Justice Kennedy being consistent and predictable. Sometimes I wonder if the way he decides a case depends on which side of the bed he gets up on. Back in 1992, while handling the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Kennedy flipped on the abortion issue. Even his own clerks thought he was going to vote with the conservatives, and thus Roe was going to be overturned that year. When Kennedy decided to vote with O'Connor and Souter and to not overturn Roe, the clerks started serenading him with the theme music from the TV show Flipper. (Source: Prof. Mark Tushnet's book "A Court Divided," published in 2005.)
Kennedy is a "flipper" too about "gay rights." He's been in favor of "gay equality" a few times without ever having said that the Equal Protection Clause always requires equal treatment for gay people. He's been trying to avoid saying that. But over 30 years ago, when he was on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, he wrote an opinion upholding the federal government's prerogative to ban openly gay people from the military. And he has voted with the conservative wing of the Court to say that the First Amendment protects the right of the Boy Scouts of America to exclude gays from being scoutmasters.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #91 on: December 13, 2016, 11:28:34 PM »

This bill doesn't even have a life of the mother exception to it. Yikes!

I'm Pro-Life and i'm against Abortion with no exceptions.

so you are anti-life?
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,876
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #92 on: December 13, 2016, 11:29:51 PM »

Over 30 years ago, coming out in favor of gays in the military as a judge would probably have resulted in him becoming the laughingstock of the judicial system. Everyone still hated gays then. And the boy scouts is a private club that makes no claim to serve the public at large,  so the equal protection clause objectively doesn't apply to them.

This bill doesn't even have a life of the mother exception to it. Yikes!

I'm Pro-Life and i'm against Abortion with no exceptions.

so you are anti-life?

I wouldn't call favoring the classic "3 exceptions" (assuming he holds that position or something similar) anti-life.
Logged
Mike67
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 396
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #93 on: December 13, 2016, 11:34:31 PM »

This bill doesn't even have a life of the mother exception to it. Yikes!

I'm Pro-Life and i'm against Abortion with no exceptions.

so you are anti-life?

I'm for protecting the life of the Baby and that is the essence of Pro-Life to me. It's not the fault of the child the reasons that he or she was conceived.
Logged
Pheurton Skeurto
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,444
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #94 on: December 13, 2016, 11:38:21 PM »

This bill doesn't even have a life of the mother exception to it. Yikes!

I'm Pro-Life and i'm against Abortion with no exceptions.

so you are anti-life?

I'm for protecting the life of the Baby and that is the essence of Pro-Life to me. It's not the fault of the child the reasons that he or she was conceived.

So you support strong government benefits for unwed teenage mothers who need to go on welfare or food stamps to support their infant child, right? Especially if that unwed teenage mother was raped and doesn't have the money for counselling, which the government would pay for as well, right? Because you support children, right?
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #95 on: December 13, 2016, 11:43:53 PM »
« Edited: December 13, 2016, 11:46:10 PM by ApatheticAustrian »

I wouldn't call favoring the classic "3 exceptions" (assuming he holds that position or something similar) anti-life.

i read it like he especially stated that there are no possible exceptions and i think mike agreed to my interpretation.

if it misinterpreted his post, i am deeply sorry - "normal" abortion foes don't get my snark, i just can't stand it if people value the life of the child higher than that of the mother.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #96 on: December 14, 2016, 04:29:50 AM »

I wouldn't call favoring the classic "3 exceptions" (assuming he holds that position or something similar) anti-life.

i read it like he especially stated that there are no possible exceptions and i think mike agreed to my interpretation.

if it misinterpreted his post, i am deeply sorry - "normal" abortion foes don't get my snark, i just can't stand it if people value the life of the child higher than that of the mother.

I hope if a law like that becomes the of the land or any part of it, that there are enough people to ignore that it causes a lot of problems.
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,038
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #97 on: December 14, 2016, 05:25:45 AM »

Why do Republicans preach about how evil it is to have the government involved in people's healthcare but they want the government to control women's reproductive rights? I know the answer already but these people are such tools.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #98 on: December 14, 2016, 07:47:38 AM »

Banning abortion is doomed to fail...it's like prohibition.

Before Roe vs Wade...there were a million abortions done a year under the table. All banning abortion would do is move it back to those circumstances. And since we all know that no state would be willing to fully enforce jailing women who have abortions, just like with prohibition, then the ban is doomed to fail.

Never understood pro-lifers, their viewpoint on abortion is doomed to fail just like in every other country where abortion is banned

It just destroys the credibility of the state where it already has record low credibility. But who knows? Maybe they can say they are closing gender gap in America's prisons and creating jobs? 5 by 25 could the post-Roe GOP slogan. 5 million in prison by 2025.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #99 on: December 14, 2016, 07:52:03 AM »

This bill doesn't even have a life of the mother exception to it. Yikes!

I'm Pro-Life and i'm against Abortion with no exceptions.

So the life and well being of the mother is less important than the fetus and her death is okay as long as the fetus lives?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 10 queries.