Why haven't any states gone the unicameral, parliamentary route? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 02:01:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Why haven't any states gone the unicameral, parliamentary route? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why haven't any states gone the unicameral, parliamentary route?  (Read 3418 times)
SteveRogers
duncan298
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,196


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -5.04

« on: April 09, 2014, 12:23:53 AM »

I don't think the republican guarantee clause would prohibit a state from adopting such a system (and even if it might, the Supreme Court almost certainly wouldn't touch that with a ten foot pole).

That being said, a parliamentary system sort of goes against the idea of separation of powers which is pretty highly valued in American culture. Plus, a lot of our other institutions such as single-member districts, direct primaries, fixed terms, and a pure two-party system, while certainly compatible with a parliamentary system, tend to point the other direction. It's hard to see what the benefit would be at the state level. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.