1968: RFK/Hatfield vs. Nixon/Agnew vs. Wallace/LeMay. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 09:13:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1968: RFK/Hatfield vs. Nixon/Agnew vs. Wallace/LeMay. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1968: RFK/Hatfield vs. Nixon/Agnew vs. Wallace/LeMay.  (Read 3409 times)
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


« on: November 21, 2010, 10:13:10 PM »
RFK.
Reply, with maps
Logged
hawkeye59
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,530
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2010, 05:56:25 PM »
Quote from: Fmr Gov, NE Rep. Polnut on November 21, 2010, 11:15:16 PM
Quote from: Giovanni on November 21, 2010, 10:56:59 PM
That is true, RFK's opposition to the war was never legitimate in the first place.

Can you elaborate please?

I think if Nixon barely held off Humphrey in WI, IL, CA, MO... RFK would have won them all and pushed him into the 300's range.

1968 was actually a physically close election - the 510,000 vote PV margin shows that plenty of states could have gone the other way without much pressure.


Kennedy probably would have won Oregon and Alaska, and lost Texas and Missouri.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 9 queries.