1968: RFK/Hatfield vs. Nixon/Agnew vs. Wallace/LeMay. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 05:41:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1968: RFK/Hatfield vs. Nixon/Agnew vs. Wallace/LeMay. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1968: RFK/Hatfield vs. Nixon/Agnew vs. Wallace/LeMay.  (Read 3405 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« on: November 21, 2010, 11:15:16 PM »
« edited: November 21, 2010, 11:30:34 PM by Fmr Gov, NE Rep. Polnut »

That is true, RFK's opposition to the war was never legitimate in the first place.

Can you elaborate please?

I think if Nixon barely held off Humphrey in WI, IL, CA, MO... RFK would have won them all and pushed him into the 300's range.

1968 was actually a physically close election - the 510,000 vote PV margin shows that plenty of states could have gone the other way without much pressure.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.