How would these 2006 senate races play out nationally?

[DownWithTheLeft]

Rhode Island: Chafee (R) v. Whitehouse (D)

Whitehouse landslide because conservatives don't show up or run 3rd party

New York: Clinton (D) v. Spencer (R)

One of the few Repubs Hillary would beat

Missouri: Talent (R) v. McCaskill (D)

Massachusetts: Kennedy (D) v. Chase (R)

Chase wins because Ted Kennedy has too much bad name recog

Virginia: Allen (R) v. Webb (D)

W/macaca included (otherwise not close) Allen by a hair

Do others later

[DownWithTheLeft]

If you make maps like these, be sure to put the winner of the Senate Race in winning their own state.

I disagree I think on nat'l level Talent beats McCaskill and Allen defeats Webb

[DownWithTheLeft]

If you make maps like these, be sure to put the winner of the Senate Race in winning their own state.

Hahaha yeh I love how he has McCaskill losing MO and Webb losing VA.

I'm going to assume you don't considering your usual lack of knowledge, but there is a difference between national and state elections and it would depend 100% on turnout in VA considering how razor-thin the vote was.  If the election was the next day and it rained heavily in N. VA Allen might have won.

[DownWithTheLeft]

If you make maps like these, be sure to put the winner of the Senate Race in winning their own state.

I disagree I think on nat'l level Talent beats McCaskill and Allen defeats Webb

What on Earth do you mean "on the national level"?  The voters in Missouri would be the exact same ones who gave McCaskill a 2% lead over Talent.  You don't get a new set of voters when you're voting for president.

There is a difference between voting for Sen. McCaskill and Pres. McCaskill

[DownWithTheLeft]

There is a difference between voting for Sen. McCaskill and Pres. McCaskill

Why would voters in Missouri want a Sen. McCaskill but then also want a Pres. Talent?

It's more like Sen. Democrat and Pres. Republican, this does make a difference