So now the Obamites are trying to discredit the most reliable pollster of this primary season because it doesn't fit their hypothesis of St. Obama's performance in Indiana. Nice.
Yet if Obama was up 12 in Indiana, you'd all be extolling the virtues of SurveyUSA's terrific track record.
You're becoming an extremely annoying hack. Learn to accept reasonable arguments and at least consider their merit before resorting to cheap taunting.
When I finally see a reasonable argument from an Obamite, I'll accept it. I haven't seen one yet, just more wishful thinking and more nitpicking of a pollster that has had a terrific track record and just produced a poll that didn't show St. Obama leading by 30 points.
You're certainly welcome to highlight discrepancies in the statistical sub-samples of any poll that shows Hillary Clinton doing better than expected, just as two supporters of Barack Obama have done here. I should hope that your belief that such criticism is "nitpicking" was merely hyperbole.
