Why are the worst suburbs across state lines? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 06:40:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why are the worst suburbs across state lines? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why are the worst suburbs across state lines?  (Read 1117 times)
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


« on: January 10, 2014, 09:32:45 PM »
« edited: January 10, 2014, 09:34:51 PM by ag »

Actually, Newark is far more of an exception than Gary. (Now... if the OP had referred to Jersey City...)

Newark is far easier to get to from Midtown or the Village than most of NYC. PATH takes about 20 or 25 min from Christopher St. - actually, there are places in Manhattan where the subway takes longer. The bits of swamp in between notwithstanding, this would not have been a different city, if not for the state line.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2014, 09:37:47 PM »

State lines cut up urban areas, making technical "suburbs" of what would have been inner city districts otherwise.

Newark, of course is (or, at least, used to be) quite a separate urban core - but then so was Brooklyn. In any case, whether it is a separate inner city, or an extension of NYC, Newark is not a suburb in any sense of the word. The same, I guess, is frequently true in other places as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.