Will there ever be another peacetime president? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 05:18:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Will there ever be another peacetime president? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will there ever be another peacetime president?  (Read 3714 times)
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,234
Georgia


« on: April 17, 2015, 08:00:41 AM »

Typically speaking being a "peacetime President" isn't something you choose.

Johnson could have chosen not to start the War in Vietnam.
Nixon could have left in a much more timely manner.
Reagan could have chosen not to invade Granada.
Bush the Elder could have chosen not to fight Iraq.
Bush the Younger could have chosen not to simply go after Al Qaeda, and nothing else.
Obama could have left Iraq and Afghanistan within his first year in office.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,234
Georgia


« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2015, 12:39:17 AM »

Johnson could have chosen not to start the War in Vietnam.
Nixon could have left in a much more timely manner.
Reagan could have chosen not to invade Granada.
Bush the Elder could have chosen not to fight Iraq.
Bush the Younger could have chosen not to simply go after Al Qaeda, and nothing else.
Obama could have left Iraq and Afghanistan within his first year in office.

None of this is that simple and you know it.

It seems pretty simple to me.

Notice how China, a very powerful nation, doesn't feel the need to intervene everywhere.  Neither does Russia or India.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,234
Georgia


« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2015, 12:57:22 PM »

Johnson could have chosen not to start the War in Vietnam.
Nixon could have left in a much more timely manner.
Reagan could have chosen not to invade Granada.
Bush the Elder could have chosen not to fight Iraq.
Bush the Younger could have chosen not to simply go after Al Qaeda, and nothing else.
Obama could have left Iraq and Afghanistan within his first year in office.

None of this is that simple and you know it.

It seems pretty simple to me.

Notice how China, a very powerful nation, doesn't feel the need to intervene everywhere.  Neither does Russia or India.

Ukraine and Georgia say hi. What's that? Andhra Pradesh, Bengal areas, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, said what's up.

They intervene near their borders.  They aren't intervening in conflicts in South America though.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.