Maximizing geography of losing candidates (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 01:30:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Maximizing geography of losing candidates (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Maximizing geography of losing candidates  (Read 3015 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« on: November 22, 2014, 03:20:57 AM »
Good idea!



Tillis- 1,399,913 (48.13%)
Hagan- 1,399,822 (48.12%)
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2014, 05:41:17 PM »


Edwin Edwards- 864,150
David Duke- 863, 890
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2014, 09:53:32 PM »
^ My attempt:



Johnston- 680,466
Duke- 679,823
Others- 35,923

Johnston's strength was less concentrated in New Orleans than Edwards'. I didn't touch the third parties' share of the votes. Johnston was from Shreveport and got 63% in Caddo Parish. If you concede Caddo to Johnston, you could get many of the rural parishes several shades darker blue.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2014, 10:35:43 PM »
^ So basically something like this, giving Caddo to Johnston:



Johnston- 680,231
Duke- 680, 058
Others- 35923
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.