Is a military background still of advantage?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 02:20:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Is a military background still of advantage?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is a military background still of advantage?  (Read 683 times)
solarstorm
solarstorm2012
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,637
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 07, 2014, 05:58:51 AM »

Joni Ernst, Tom Cotton and Seth Moulton and Tammy Duckworth each competed in a hotly contested congressional election. And each of them won their contest.
Is a military background still such a benefit?
Would they all also have won if they had never joined the services?
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,465
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2014, 06:26:12 AM »

If their service was honorable, of course it's a benefit.  It's not a benefit to every voter, but certainly with enough voters to make a difference in a close election.

Even more so if they did something heroic like JFK or Bush the Greater.  Or was a good manager of war/men like Grant or Ike.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2014, 10:52:56 AM »

In an election where 80% of the electorate was middle-aged or senior whites?  Of course.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,307
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2014, 12:42:47 PM »

Max Cleland disagrees with this
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2014, 01:11:34 PM »

Nope. People who care about military background would vote for a limp-wristed effeminate Republican who made his money in women's perfume over a Democrat Purple Heart winner 10 times out of 10, calling the latter a coward all the way.
Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2014, 05:37:08 PM »

Nope. People who care about military background would vote for a limp-wristed effeminate Republican who made his money in women's perfume over a Democrat Purple Heart winner 10 times out of 10, calling the latter a coward all the way.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2014, 08:47:31 PM »

Nope. People who care about military background would vote for a limp-wristed effeminate Republican who made his money in women's perfume over a Democrat Purple Heart winner 10 times out of 10, calling the latter a coward all the way.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2014, 09:17:10 PM »

yes, or at least it is with me.  Those who have sent men to their deaths, or who have crawled though sh**t dodging bullets are less likely to take authorizations of militarily lightly than the armchair warriors we have in power just now.  If Bush had served in Viet Nam, instead of spending that period drunk and high on cocaine, absent without leave from a cushy reserve position, he might not have been so quick to ask the congress for an invasion of Iraq, and if the members of congress had served, they might not have been so quick to grant it.  In fact, you'll recall that it was Powell, among all his deputies, that hesitated the most and most seriously sought proof of weapons labs before committing.
 
Logged
solarstorm
solarstorm2012
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,637
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2014, 12:50:27 AM »

Nope. People who care about military background would vote for a limp-wristed effeminate Republican who made his money in women's perfume over a Democrat Purple Heart winner 10 times out of 10, calling the latter a coward all the way.

I am apparently the only one not to understand that joke ...

Is it something about Tisei, Schock or DeMaio?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.224 seconds with 12 queries.