Is Conservapedia's entry on Obama balanced? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 03:47:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Is Conservapedia's entry on Obama balanced? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is Conservapedia's entry on Obama balanced?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
No, but it is hilarious
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Is Conservapedia's entry on Obama balanced?  (Read 2382 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,477
United States


« on: May 26, 2009, 11:53:45 AM »

The most amazing part is that these people HATE drugs, yet are clearly on something.

Really though, it's an embarrassment to conservatives everywhere.  Group ignorance is both funny and sad.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,477
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2009, 11:51:49 PM »

The most amazing part is that these people HATE drugs, yet are clearly on something.

Really though, it's an embarrassment to conservatives everywhere.  Group ignorance is both funny and sad.

I really don't understand why you in particular label yourself a 'conservative'. Conservatism and libertarianism are fundamentally askance worldviews.
Because I'm weird.  I still like guns and Jews.  I don't hate Christians.  My economics. 

I'd love to take back the word "liberal", but that's not going to happen.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,477
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2009, 07:18:38 AM »

snopes

Not that anything will change the mind of somebody so willfully ignorant as to believe this particular conspiracy theory.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.