SCOTUS nominee expected as early as this morning EDIT: looks like it's Garland (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 05:02:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  SCOTUS nominee expected as early as this morning EDIT: looks like it's Garland (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SCOTUS nominee expected as early as this morning EDIT: looks like it's Garland  (Read 14218 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« on: March 16, 2016, 08:17:39 PM »
Perhaps the most annoying thing to happen substance-wise in opposition to Garland is the assumption by many Republicans that because he voted in favor of rehearing on Parker v. District of Columbia he MUST be anti-gun.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2016, 06:01:40 PM »
Quote from: Bow all your heads to our adored Mary Katherine. on March 17, 2016, 04:36:22 PM
Quote from: MK on March 17, 2016, 03:41:30 PM
No . This guy has a horrible 2nd admin record.   They shouldn't entertain the ideal of even meeting with this left wing loon.

He voted to rehear a case without taking a position on its merits.

Yeah, as I indicated above, that is the worst possible reason to oppose him.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2016, 08:37:03 PM »

One Senator posing a hypothetical that never came to fruition.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2016, 03:11:08 PM »
Quote from: MK on March 19, 2016, 01:56:26 AM
This guy is against the rights of people to keep and bare arms as witnessed by Judge Garland wanting to reconsider the ruling D.C. vs Heller


They shouldnt even give him a chance.  Hes a trojan horse.

How does voting to merely rehear the case amount to opposing a constitutional right that you don't even know how to spell?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.