Only 36% of Republicans think it’s important couples with children should be married
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 07:08:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Only 36% of Republicans think it’s important couples with children should be married
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: Only 36% of Republicans think it’s important couples with children should be married  (Read 1399 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,081


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 17, 2022, 02:39:24 PM »



This a pretty doomer poll
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,226
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2022, 02:40:44 PM »


I don't really see what's bad about it.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,081


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2022, 02:43:01 PM »



The core of social conservatism should be about the  nuclear family yet a majority of conservatives now no longer thing that’s important
Logged
GregTheGreat657
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,906
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.77, S: -1.04

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2022, 02:43:28 PM »

Children with unmarried parents tend to have worse outcomes than those with married parents
Logged
MRS DONNA SHALALA
cuddlebuns
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 598
South Africa


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2022, 02:46:05 PM »



The core of social conservatism should be about the  nuclear family yet a majority of conservatives now no longer thing that’s important

That's sort of what happens when you build your whole movement around a serial adulterer who has kids from multiple relationships.
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,226
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2022, 02:48:04 PM »



The core of social conservatism should be about the  nuclear family yet a majority of conservatives now no longer thing that’s important

Yeah because modern social conservatism is all about owning the libs.
Logged
TheReckoning
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,799
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2022, 02:49:27 PM »

Children with unmarried parents tend to have worse outcomes than those with married parents
This is a very important point that will be ignored in the name of “oWn ThE sOcCoNs”
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,666
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2022, 02:53:41 PM »

Young Republicans don't care about gay marriage anymore and co-inhabitation or whatever you call this...

Abortion is the thing that social conservatives care about.
Logged
Bootes Void
iamaganster123
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,677
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2022, 02:56:01 PM »

Children with unmarried parents tend to have worse outcomes than those with married parents
Is there a difference between two parent unmarried household and married households?
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,226
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2022, 02:56:34 PM »

Children with unmarried parents tend to have worse outcomes than those with married parents
This is a very important point that will be ignored in the name of “oWn ThE sOcCoNs”

Is there anything inherent about being legally married that leads to these outcomes, or is it that people who are unmarried with kids also tend to correlate with other stuff like lower income, etc?
Logged
Thank you for being a friend...
progressive85
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,369
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2022, 02:57:05 PM »

This is one of those "__% of Republicans are actually that not that conservative" polls that comes out every month.  

I'll believe it when they start voting for Republican candidates that actually believe what these polls claim the rank and file do.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,960
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2022, 03:12:40 PM »



The core of social conservatism should be about the  nuclear family yet a majority of conservatives now no longer thing that’s important

The nuclear family (i.e., a married couple and their minor children under one roof) is relatively new as a normative model.  Nuclear families would not have been the unquestioned assumption they are today during pre-industrial times when most Americans lived on farms, for instance. 
Logged
Aurelius
Cody
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,163
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2022, 03:22:32 PM »

Young Republicans don't care about gay marriage anymore and co-inhabitation or whatever you call this...

Abortion is the thing that social conservatives care about.


I support gay marriage and I also think it's important that couples with kids be married,  and that kids be born in wedlock.

It's not mutually exclusive.

I'm part of the 36%.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,081


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2022, 03:38:06 PM »



The core of social conservatism should be about the  nuclear family yet a majority of conservatives now no longer thing that’s important

The nuclear family (i.e., a married couple and their minor children under one roof) is relatively new as a normative model.  Nuclear families would not have been the unquestioned assumption they are today during pre-industrial times when most Americans lived on farms, for instance. 


Sure but weren’t joint families more common then
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,960
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2022, 03:43:52 PM »



The core of social conservatism should be about the  nuclear family yet a majority of conservatives now no longer thing that’s important

The nuclear family (i.e., a married couple and their minor children under one roof) is relatively new as a normative model.  Nuclear families would not have been the unquestioned assumption they are today during pre-industrial times when most Americans lived on farms, for instance. 


Sure but weren’t joint families more common then

Yeah exactly, that's the point.

Our conception of "family" is mostly dictated by broader economic and social trends.  The ideal that only one or two working adults could provide a comfortable, middle class upbringing to their children could have never taken hold without the postwar economic boom and the massive productivity gains that defined the 20th century.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,081


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2022, 03:46:29 PM »



The core of social conservatism should be about the  nuclear family yet a majority of conservatives now no longer thing that’s important

The nuclear family (i.e., a married couple and their minor children under one roof) is relatively new as a normative model.  Nuclear families would not have been the unquestioned assumption they are today during pre-industrial times when most Americans lived on farms, for instance. 


Sure but weren’t joint families more common then

Yeah exactly, that's the point.

Our conception of "family" is mostly dictated by broader economic and social trends.  The ideal that only one or two working adults could provide a comfortable, middle class upbringing to their children could have never taken hold without the postwar economic boom and the massive productivity gains that defined the 20th century.

Sure but then you need something to replace the previous system with, rather than just breaking the family structure up .


Like if there was a trend back to joint families then I wouldn’t say it is  bad but we aren’t having that
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,960
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2022, 03:54:35 PM »



The core of social conservatism should be about the  nuclear family yet a majority of conservatives now no longer thing that’s important

The nuclear family (i.e., a married couple and their minor children under one roof) is relatively new as a normative model.  Nuclear families would not have been the unquestioned assumption they are today during pre-industrial times when most Americans lived on farms, for instance. 


Sure but weren’t joint families more common then

Yeah exactly, that's the point.

Our conception of "family" is mostly dictated by broader economic and social trends.  The ideal that only one or two working adults could provide a comfortable, middle class upbringing to their children could have never taken hold without the postwar economic boom and the massive productivity gains that defined the 20th century.

Sure but then you need something to replace the previous system with, rather than just breaking the family structure up .


Like if there was a trend back to joint families then I wouldn’t say it is  bad but we aren’t having that

Well, the new system itself is reflective of certain realities:  fewer marriageable men due to high incarceration rates and less well-paying blue-collar work, a more robust social safety net for young children, women with young children not being very active/sought after in the marriage market, etc.  Start tinkering to change some of these things and you'll see the state of American family start to trend in a different direction.     
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,274
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2022, 03:55:09 PM »

The random working class voters Republicans add to their base the less socially conservative these samples are going to become on issues like this. Not exactly everyone wants a family now and those who do don't all believe that a family has to look like "Leave It To Beaver".

Marriage isn't for everyone. Some couples are better off being together and not getting married. For some people marriage changes the feel of the relationship.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,960
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 17, 2022, 03:56:09 PM »

Marriage isn't for everyone. Some couples are better off being together and not getting married. For some people marriage changes the feel of the relationship.

Marriage should change the feel of the relationship, lmao
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,274
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2022, 03:57:05 PM »

Marriage isn't for everyone. Some couples are better off being together and not getting married. For some people marriage changes the feel of the relationship.

Marriage should change the feel of the relationship, lmao

That's not a good thing if it changes it for the worse.
Logged
Big Abraham
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,052
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2022, 03:58:05 PM »

The random working class voters Republicans add to their base the less socially conservative these samples are going to become on issues like this. Not exactly everyone wants a family now and those who do don't all believe that a family has to look like "Leave It To Beaver".

Marriage isn't for everyone. Some couples are better off being together and not getting married. For some people marriage changes the feel of the relationship.

If you aren't prepared for the responsibility of at least taking on a common-law marriage, how could you be prepared for the responsibility of bearing children?
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 17, 2022, 03:59:01 PM »



The core of social conservatism should be about the  nuclear family yet a majority of conservatives now no longer thing that’s important

How many think it's important just not "very important" as the poll describes? To me, this means Republicans are getting less rigidly traditional (meaning: their branching out beyond their evangelical base), and perhaps more skeptical of the institution of marriage. But the idea that they're getting more anti-family is nonsensical. Having a family with kids is still preferred, but marriage isn't a neccesity for everyone.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,274
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 17, 2022, 04:04:20 PM »

The random working class voters Republicans add to their base the less socially conservative these samples are going to become on issues like this. Not exactly everyone wants a family now and those who do don't all believe that a family has to look like "Leave It To Beaver".

Marriage isn't for everyone. Some couples are better off being together and not getting married. For some people marriage changes the feel of the relationship.

If you aren't prepared for the responsibility of at least taking on a common-law marriage, how could you be prepared for the responsibility of bearing children?

That implies that you have to be married on paper to responsibly have children and that is not true. There are plenty of married people who are irresponsible parents or don't have the means to raise children. Marriage has nothing to do with properly raising children.
Logged
Big Abraham
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,052
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 17, 2022, 04:06:25 PM »

The random working class voters Republicans add to their base the less socially conservative these samples are going to become on issues like this. Not exactly everyone wants a family now and those who do don't all believe that a family has to look like "Leave It To Beaver".

Marriage isn't for everyone. Some couples are better off being together and not getting married. For some people marriage changes the feel of the relationship.

If you aren't prepared for the responsibility of at least taking on a common-law marriage, how could you be prepared for the responsibility of bearing children?

That implies that you have to be married on paper to responsibly have children and that is not true. There are plenty of married people who are irresponsible parents or don't have the means to raise children. Marriage has nothing to do with properly raising children.

A common-law marriage is decidedly not a marriage on paper.
Logged
Hammy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,702
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 17, 2022, 04:10:54 PM »

Children with unmarried parents tend to have worse outcomes than those with married parents

Every such study I've seen focused specifically on divorced parents, as divorce is often traumatic especially for younger children, and growing up in a single parent household has it's own problems that come with it.

However, if both parents are present and simply never marry in the first place this point is moot.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.062 seconds with 10 queries.