Jindal to attack Trump

[JonathanSwift]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Read more here: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jindal-set-to-attack-trump/article/2571705

[Free Bird]

Does he want to go into negative percentages?

[JonathanSwift]

Does he want to go into negative percentages?

I had assumed he was already there.

[Bigby]

Does he want to go into negative percentages?

I had assumed he was already there.

Didn't Perry get into the negatives in 2012?

[JonathanSwift]

Does he want to go into negative percentages?

I had assumed he was already there.

Didn't Perry get into the negatives in 2012?

Actually, I believe you are thinking of 2015.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

When does Jindal give this up and decide he wants to replace Vitter?

[NeverAgain]

Jindal's campaign is an argument for the free market. If it's weak, let it file for bankruptcy and take everything and everyone down with it.

[Mehmentum]

Its a foolproof strategy, Jindal is immune from backlash because he's already completely irrelevant!

Gilmore would be an even better candidate.  I don't think Trump even knows who he is, so he'll never see it coming.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Its a foolproof strategy, Jindal is immune from backlash because he's already completely irrelevant!

Gilmore would be an even better candidate.  I don't think Trump even knows who he is, so he'll never see it coming.

Gilmore might be so irrelevant that Trump will never see it, period.

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

Does he want to go into negative percentages?

Maybe he's hoping the percentage counter will wrap around?

In all seriousness, I think he's just hoping that this will get him some air time.

[JonathanSwift]

Jindal also released a rather bizarre attack ad against Trump:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBJb9D8_kj0

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Jindal also released a rather bizarre attack ad against Trump:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBJb9D8_kj0

A Rhodes scholar thinks that's an attack ad? The Rhodes scholarship program should disband immediately.

[dudeabides]

The fact that Trump praises Kanye West shows that he is white trash.

[Blair]

The fact that Trump praises Kanye West shows that he is white trash.

because any white person who can appreciate Kanye must be white trash...

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

The fact that Trump praises Kanye West shows that he is white trash.

That is false by definition of white trash.

On the contrary, Phil Robertson spoke as the lead-in to Jeb Bush at CPAC...now there are some white trash fans.

[The Free North]

Jindal also released a rather bizarre attack ad against Trump:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBJb9D8_kj0

Yeah I saw that. Probably one of the least effective ads I have ever seen.

Can he just drop out already?

[dudeabides]

The fact that Trump praises Kanye West shows that he is white trash.

That is false by definition of white trash.

On the contrary, Phil Robertson spoke as the lead-in to Jeb Bush at CPAC...now there are some white trash fans.

Robertson fans are white trash, yes. They support Jindal.

[weixiaobao]

Trump replied, "Bobby Jindal did not make the debate stage and therefore I have never met him…. .... I only respond to people that register more than 1% in the polls. I never thought he had a chance and I’ve been proven right."

Jindal responded, ".@realdonaldtrump We have met. You wrote a check. A fool & his money are soon parted. A fool & his dad’s money are parted sooner."

Decent comeback from Jindal.  The sad thing is that the anti Trump camp are too many.  Fighting over supports of too few.  Until many drop out, if Jindal get a rise from this.  It only hurt him, Kasich, Rubio, Bush, Fiorina, etc since those votes are split. 

[Fuzzy Bear]

The fact that Trump praises Kanye West shows that he is white trash.

That is false by definition of white trash.

On the contrary, Phil Robertson spoke as the lead-in to Jeb Bush at CPAC...now there are some white trash fans.

Robertson fans are white trash, yes. They support Jindal.

I'm wearing my Duck Dynasty shirt as I type this.  What am I, again?

That being said:  I saw Jindal on C-Span last night.  He was attacking Trump, and he was clear and coherent in his delivery, as well as very well organized.  I found him personally impressive, and one of the GOP candidates I COULD vote for.  The problem with Jindal is that he doesn't understand how the race is not about who's more conservative than who.  That worked in 2012 somewhat, but it doesn't fly now.

[Simfan34]

Trump replied, "Bobby Jindal did not make the debate stage and therefore I have never met him…. .... I only respond to people that register more than 1% in the polls. I never thought he had a chance and I’ve been proven right."

Jindal responded, ".@realdonaldtrump We have met. You wrote a check. A fool & his money are soon parted. A fool & his dad’s money are parted sooner."

Decent comeback from Jindal.  The sad thing is that the anti Trump camp are too many.  Fighting over supports of too few.  Until many drop out, if Jindal get a rise from this.  It only hurt him, Kasich, Rubio, Bush, Fiorina, etc since those votes are split. 

Jindal's come prepared.

[Fuzzy Bear]

Trump replied, "Bobby Jindal did not make the debate stage and therefore I have never met him…. .... I only respond to people that register more than 1% in the polls. I never thought he had a chance and I’ve been proven right."

Jindal responded, ".@realdonaldtrump We have met. You wrote a check. A fool & his money are soon parted. A fool & his dad’s money are parted sooner."

Decent comeback from Jindal.  The sad thing is that the anti Trump camp are too many.  Fighting over supports of too few.  Until many drop out, if Jindal get a rise from this.  It only hurt him, Kasich, Rubio, Bush, Fiorina, etc since those votes are split. 

Jindal's come prepared.

Moreso than most, I will note. 

Jindal had the best gaffe of the 2012 campaign.  He uttered a Freudian slip when he referred to the Affordable Care Act as "Obomneycare".

I think Jindal is a guy who, like Fiorina, could get some traction.  Really, he's a better candidate than Jeb Bush, Scott Walker,  or Chris Christie.  He's more polished than Marco Rubio (who comes off as overeager too often) and John Kasich (who comes off as angry occasionally).  It won't be easy, but I think he could get a Fiorina-esque bump with a good debate showing, even at the "kiddie table".  He shows well.  His problem to date is that there's little to separate him from everyone else, but if he could solve that problem, he could get some traction.