Meh. Seems to be a lot of states where nesting is an option / the ideal rather than required, and they're listed as "yes" in that document.
Alabama has some Senate districts that perfectly include three House districts, but a lot of them don't, with no rhyme or reason apparent.
In Hawai'i, they seem to have been allocating seat numbers in both chambers to counties, and the result was 7/3 to Hawaii (no nesting), 6/3 to Maui (nesting), 3/1 to Kauai (nesting. Of a sort. It's in flat contradiction to the "16% at very extreme maximum" language in the document you linked to, btw. That Senate district is 20% oversized, the House districts are 18% undersized on average.) and 35/18 to Oahu (no nesting).
Maryland is also weird - there's three house members for every Senator, but some Senate seats function as a three-member seat for the House, while others are subdivided either into three single-member seats or a single and a double. In a couple of cases this is done to create additional minority-majority House seats, but elsewhere it's just because the Senate district includes disparate areas and splits reasonably well. Most of the large rural Senate districts are subdivided. At least the numbering scheme flags these districts at first glance.
Ohio is of the Wyoming school.
South Dakota - basically as I remembered, except for the descriptions of what rezzes go into what.
It should read
They also redrew three Senate districts, thus increasing the number of Native Opportunity seats from 1 & 2 (a Pine Ridge & Rosebud constituency packed with Dakotas) to 1 & 4 (two of the four new single member districts, one entirely within Standing Rock/Cheyenne River, the other based on Rosebud; and the redrawn, now less packed Senate district based on Pine Ridge.)
And Wyoming. And that's the full list of oddities.
