MO-Remington Research (R): Hawley +4 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 12, 2024, 12:58:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-Remington Research (R): Hawley +4 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-Remington Research (R): Hawley +4  (Read 5299 times)
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

« on: January 08, 2018, 10:34:36 PM »

It is impossible to look at Castros analysis + this poll + the national environment and not conclude that this shows McCaskill as a clear favorite.

This poll performed well in the 2016 Senate Race ( https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=250717.0) and any poll with a positive Trump approval is bad for McCaskill. She's not doomed, but taking a poll showing her trailing as further justification for your Safe D rating  (which should mean she'll win even if everything that could possibly go wrong does) makes little sense.

Dude, no one here thinks this is safe D LOL. Tilt R, still winnable for McCaskill though.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2018, 10:39:01 PM »

Sh!t, if only McCaskill was a little less left, and not such a champion for planned parenthood, she would probably be leading Hawley anywhere from 2-5 points right now. Hawley 4+ sounds about right at this time.

Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2018, 10:46:21 PM »

It is impossible to look at Castros analysis + this poll + the national environment and not conclude that this shows McCaskill as a clear favorite.

This poll performed well in the 2016 Senate Race ( https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=250717.0) and any poll with a positive Trump approval is bad for McCaskill. She's not doomed, but taking a poll showing her trailing as further justification for your Safe D rating  (which should mean she'll win even if everything that could possibly go wrong does) makes little sense.

Dude, no one here thinks this is safe D LOL. Tilt R, still winnable for McCaskill though.

I'd say Tilt D.

Fair enough.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2018, 12:28:14 AM »

My prediction is that Josh Hawley wins 57-42, I don't think any Democrats can come within single-digits of winning Missouri due to partisan polarization.

I predict that you have a brain tumor.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2018, 01:30:39 AM »

Greitens has probably pushed this to about a McCaskill 1+ or 2+ at this point now, I wonder if it will stay.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2018, 01:34:57 AM »

Also Claire has a giant coffer, so once she starts pouring in, I could see her go up a few points, and honestly now, I think she might eek it out by a point tilt R--->tossup.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 14 queries.