north korea and nuclear testing (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 01:57:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  north korea and nuclear testing (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: north korea and nuclear testing  (Read 1468 times)
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,717
United States


« on: April 19, 2005, 04:17:59 PM »

Oh please.  Kim Jong Il is a genious for getting the Nuke.  Saddam's certainly wishing he had a few before the bliztkreig rolled over him.  Sovereignty in the age of US agression = a nice nuclear arsenal.

6,000>1 or 2

it is high time the us stop acting like a wussy.  we should blow these  terrorist states off the map.   id start witrh north korea, but syria would be a close second.

Why?  None of those states has done anything remotely as 'terroristic' as what we have just done in Iraq.  You're just applying a double standard.

Not that I'm agreeing with WalterMitty but starving your population to death isn't a good enough reason? If we started starving off your home state I think you'd call other governments for help to attack the US.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,717
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2005, 04:58:55 PM »

Oh please.  Kim Jong Il is a genious for getting the Nuke.  Saddam's certainly wishing he had a few before the bliztkreig rolled over him.  Sovereignty in the age of US agression = a nice nuclear arsenal.

6,000>1 or 2

it is high time the us stop acting like a wussy.  we should blow these  terrorist states off the map.   id start witrh north korea, but syria would be a close second.

Why?  None of those states has done anything remotely as 'terroristic' as what we have just done in Iraq.  You're just applying a double standard.

Not that I'm agreeing with WalterMitty but starving your population to death isn't a good enough reason? If we started starving off your home state I think you'd call other governments for help to attack the US.

Oh please, that could be US right-wing propaganda, or maybe they simply ran out of food.  Besides, the US is oppressing its own population - the drug war is a blatant violation of human rights, and we have an enormous percentage of our population in prisons.   Land of the Free my ass, more like land of the jailhouse.

Yes the land of the free to move. Why don't you move if you dislike America or at least almost all of the policies we have?
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,717
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2005, 03:25:13 PM »

what should happen to north korea if they stage a nuclear test?

personally, i beleive north korean extinction would be the best option in that scenario.  for too many years, too many presidential administrations have allowed north korea to do basically what they want to do.

we should make clear, in no uncertain terms, that a nuclear test will absolutely not be tolerated.

Bush ainīt gonna do anything about North Korea, if they got the nuke.
 


Well if that turns out to be true then South Korea is screwed because the UN certainly will never do anything about it.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,717
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2005, 03:44:56 PM »

what should happen to north korea if they stage a nuclear test?

personally, i beleive north korean extinction would be the best option in that scenario.  for too many years, too many presidential administrations have allowed north korea to do basically what they want to do.

we should make clear, in no uncertain terms, that a nuclear test will absolutely not be tolerated.

Bush ainīt gonna do anything about North Korea, if they got the nuke.
 


Well if that turns out to be true then South Korea is screwed because the UN certainly will never do anything about it.

North Korea will most likely not invade the South.
The reason to this is:
1: South Korea army is Better
2: If an invasion happen, USA will support SK military
3: China will stop the help to NK

I really doubt any countries in the UN is gonna support NK, an invasion of SK, will most likely end up with an War ala Golf War 1. But USA, SK, Japan and maybe China will be the ones who defeat NK


Didn't say any countries in the UN would help NK but most of them wouldn't help stop the invasion.

1. SK army is better but NK could overrun the country in a matter of hours, no matter how good their army is.
2. Yes but it will have to be an attack from a beach and no direct starting base on SK land.
3. China MIGHT help stop NK but probably won't. They let us use all of our resources and then be in a better position to retake Taiwan!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.