MO-Chilenski Strategies: Romney+1
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 07:14:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MO-Chilenski Strategies: Romney+1
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-Chilenski Strategies: Romney+1  (Read 689 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 14, 2012, 11:44:33 PM »

48-47 Romney

http://www.scribd.com/doc/102750406/MO-Sen-MO-Gov-Chilenski-Strategies-for-Missouri-Scout-Aug-2012

Never heard of this company before, seems to be their first poll, because I cannot find anything else on Google.

Their numbers are similar to the SUSA poll, only that they find the US Senate race competetive, while SUSA had Akin up by about 10.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,092
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2012, 11:49:53 PM »
« Edited: August 14, 2012, 11:51:33 PM by IDS Legislator Griffin »

They at least put some work in displaying the information, so maybe that's a good sign. It's interesting that the poll also shows Todd Akin and Claire McCaskill virtually tied (48% to 47%). Still digging through it, but it's probably D-friendly from the base numbers.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

EDIT: Not a terrible sample. 36 R/31 D/33 I
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2012, 01:25:21 AM »

Between this and SUSA, it looks like Missouri is pretty close to a tossup now. It's definitely Obama's best shot at a pickup.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 15, 2012, 08:33:25 AM »

libruhl hackzors!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
marvelrobbins
Rookie
**
Posts: 116
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2012, 11:24:26 AM »

Except for a clear lead for Jay Nixon In governor's race all races are basiclly deadheats.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2012, 11:25:52 AM »

Obama probably doesn't have the spare cash to go after MO in a serious way, even if it is a potential pickup.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 15, 2012, 11:41:21 AM »

I posted their Senate poll too. I did some research, and they're based out of St. Louis, so at least they're local.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,614
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 15, 2012, 11:43:04 AM »

Interesting.

I'd think MO would be more solidly GOP than it is, considering how much of the state is rural and a mix of Midwestern and Southern heritage, and also how conservative the St. Louis suburbs are.

Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,849
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 15, 2012, 12:19:48 PM »

Obama probably doesn't have the spare cash to go after MO in a serious way, even if it is a potential pickup.

But there is a hot Senate race which may matter even more than the electoral votes.

As in North Carolina, the Republicans have no chance to do any hanky-panky with this statewide election. 
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 15, 2012, 12:51:27 PM »

Interesting.

I'd think MO would be more solidly GOP than it is, considering how much of the state is rural and a mix of Midwestern and Southern heritage, and also how conservative the St. Louis suburbs are.


St Louis burbs aren't conservative. Obama did very well there. Even Kerry won them. If you wanna see a midwestern city with conservative burbs, check out Cincy or Milwaukee.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 15, 2012, 02:32:01 PM »

Obama probably doesn't have the spare cash to go after MO in a serious way, even if it is a potential pickup.

It all depends on how things sit in October, my man. He may make a last minute run at it if the polls are close, like he did with Indiana in '08.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 15, 2012, 03:18:33 PM »

Obama probably doesn't have the spare cash to go after MO in a serious way, even if it is a potential pickup.

It all depends on how things sit in October, my man. He may make a last minute run at it if the polls are close, like he did with Indiana in '08.

In 2008 he had more cash than his opponent so he could go after IN knowing that McCain couldn't. This time it is the other way around. Romney may throw some cash at MO just to defend it anyway. We have already seen Romney significantly outspend Obama in MI and PA, both of which are somewhat like MO but on the other side (not really swing states but could be).

States like AZ, MT, GA, MO are simply not going to be tipping point states. There is no scenario when one of those goes Obama but he still loses FL and OH. Therefore they are only luxuries he cant afford
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,833


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 15, 2012, 03:21:24 PM »

Great news for Obama
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 15, 2012, 03:57:55 PM »

Obama probably doesn't have the spare cash to go after MO in a serious way, even if it is a potential pickup.

It all depends on how things sit in October, my man. He may make a last minute run at it if the polls are close, like he did with Indiana in '08.

In 2008 he had more cash than his opponent so he could go after IN knowing that McCain couldn't. This time it is the other way around. Romney may throw some cash at MO just to defend it anyway. We have already seen Romney significantly outspend Obama in MI and PA, both of which are somewhat like MO but on the other side (not really swing states but could be).

States like AZ, MT, GA, MO are simply not going to be tipping point states. There is no scenario when one of those goes Obama but he still loses FL and OH. Therefore they are only luxuries he cant afford

Well, obviously he'll have to be sitting on a pretty solid lead nationally to pay much serious attention to it (just like in '08).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 9 queries.