Which election result is more controversial: 1876, or 2000
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 10, 2024, 03:27:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which election result is more controversial: 1876, or 2000
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which election result was is more controversial: 1876, or 2000
#1
1876
 
#2
2000
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: Which election result is more controversial: 1876, or 2000  (Read 1347 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,960


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 22, 2018, 03:42:26 AM »

1876 was controversial because of the commission, and the compromise of 1877


and 2000 because of the Courts


but which election is more controversial
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,766
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2018, 10:12:29 AM »

I voted 2000 because of the butterfly ballot, but actually both. In 1876, the "loser" won an absolute majority of the PV.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2018, 01:56:21 AM »

I wonder if there's any records from the 1870s about how people felt at the time. I don't think anyone is angry about 1876 today beyond the fact that it ended Reconstruction.
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,016
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2018, 03:54:51 AM »

If you go by at the time standards, 1876 by FAR, no contest

Long term affects, 2000 easily

So they both win depending on how you look at it.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,960


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2018, 04:00:29 AM »

If you go by at the time standards, 1876 by FAR, no contest

Long term affects, 2000 easily

So they both win depending on how you look at it.

Long Term Affects I would definitely say  1876 was because the Compromise of 1877 set civil rights back for 85 years
Logged
Alabama_Indy10
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2018, 10:52:13 AM »

1876 because it was actually stolen.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 24, 2018, 01:29:10 PM »

I voted 2000 because of the butterfly ballot, but actually both. In 1876, the "loser" won an absolute majority of the PV.

Against a backdrop of massive suppression of black voters in the South making the popular vote victory less legitimate.


If it was stolen by the Republicans, it was stolen back from the Democrats who stole it first.
Logged
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,510
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2018, 11:56:50 AM »


More like traded.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,871
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2018, 09:14:37 PM »

"Tilden or Blood!"

That was the slogan of Tilden partisans during the recount.  There were some that were willing to reignite the Civil War over the issue.
Logged
Wazza [INACTIVE]
Wazza1901
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,927
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2019, 10:11:48 AM »

1876
1. the difference was one electoral vote
2. the PV winner won an absolute majority
3. Colorado's electoral votes were decided by the state legislature and not the popular vote
4.  SC and FL were decided by less than 1000 votes.
5. Voter suppression and rigging was probably prevalent on both sides.
6. Attempts to get electors to defect in Oregon with different narratives from each party
7. Both parties claiming victory in SC, FL and LA
8. Independent candidate of the Electoral Commission, David Davis, was replaced with a Republican.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2019, 12:37:43 PM »

Easily 1876
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.242 seconds with 14 queries.