DHS rejects "religiously-charged terminology" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 08:38:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  DHS rejects "religiously-charged terminology" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: DHS rejects "religiously-charged terminology"  (Read 1617 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: July 06, 2016, 06:25:46 AM »
« edited: July 06, 2016, 07:04:14 AM by I did not see L.A. »
AFAIK, "jihad" is a fairly generic term that simply means a religious commitment of some kind or another. Using it in relation to terrorism is the last thing we should do.

Sharia law is basically the Muslim equivalent of the kind of laws American fundies would like to see enacted.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2016, 02:56:03 PM »
Quote from: ingemann on July 06, 2016, 02:23:31 PM
Quote from: I did not see L.A. on July 06, 2016, 06:25:46 AM
AFAIK, "jihad" is a fairly generic term that simply means a religious commitment of some kind or another. Using it in relation to terrorism is the last thing we should do.

I love the fact that we have a Islamic scholar on this forum. You're both able to define Jihad for us, tell that it have nothing to do with Islamic Holy War and decide who's a real Muslim or not.

You need to improve your English reading comprehension.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.