Death squads - coming to a country near you

[J. J.]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29414-2005Jan22.html

Death squads for an "ongoing, indefinite, and global" war?

Ok, who has read Orwell's 1984?

Your quite right JFRAUD, we should tell the terrorist exactly where and when we're conducting covert operations against them.  Hey, let's issue photographs of the people involved too.  Why don't we give them their Social Security numbers and blood types, that works.

(This is sarcasm.)

[J. J.]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29414-2005Jan22.html

Death squads for an "ongoing, indefinite, and global" war?

Ok, who has read Orwell's 1984?

Your quite right JFRAUD, we should tell the terrorist exactly where and when we're conducting covert operations against them.  Hey, let's issue photographs of the people involved too.  Why don't we give them their Social Security numbers and blood types, that works.

(This is sarcasm.)

Who do you define to be the terrorist?

Which sounds better - my definition, which includes death squads as terrorists, or what the Bush adminstration says, which includes teacher's unions as terrorists?

I had no idea bin Laden was in the NEA.

The Defense Department is the one that administers the HUMIT, not Education.  I'll also point out these are not death squads, but groups collecting intelligence.  And you object to getting intelligence on terrorist groups.

JFRAUD you've just invented a new slogan for the loony left:

"The Loony Left.  Soft on terrorism.  Soft in the head."

[J. J.]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29414-2005Jan22.html

Death squads for an "ongoing, indefinite, and global" war?

Ok, who has read Orwell's 1984?

Your quite right JFRAUD, we should tell the terrorist exactly where and when we're conducting covert operations against them.  Hey, let's issue photographs of the people involved too.  Why don't we give them their Social Security numbers and blood types, that works.

(This is sarcasm.)

Who do you define to be the terrorist?

Which sounds better - my definition, which includes death squads as terrorists, or what the Bush adminstration says, which includes teacher's unions as terrorists?

I had no idea bin Laden was in the NEA.

The Defense Department is the one that administers the HUMIT, not Education.  I'll also point out these are not death squads, but groups collecting intelligence.  And you object to getting intelligence on terrorist groups.

JFRAUD you've just invented a new slogan for the loony left:

"The Loony Left.  Soft on terrorism.  Soft in the head."

Whatever you say, J. awful-at-Statistics

If this was coming from someone who understood the difference between probability and statistics, I'd be worried.

This is typical of the wooly logic of the loony left and of jFRAUD.  The complain that Bush didn't do enough to capture bin Laden, but then complain about intelligence measures to prevent him and others like him from being captured.

Typically, both their lack of judgment and their hypocracy bubble to to the surface, as can be seen here.

[J. J.]

If someone says "loony left" one more time I'm going to scream.

Loony left, so screech away.

I will also point that the majority of the Democrats in the US and on this board are clearly not part of the loony left.  You need only look at the the "Was Ohio Stolen" thread to see that.

[J. J.]

I would also suggest that yopu look at this thead:

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=15755.0

There are Loony Leftist out there, but mecifully, not too many on this board.

I also use "Right Wingnuts" as well.

[J. J.]

If someone says "loony left" one more time I'm going to scream.

Almost as bad as "radical right", or ''wingnuts" or labeling people neo-cons when you don't even know what a neo-con is!

Ah, there are both on this site, but not many.  The distinction has been drawn.