Roberts Demonstrates Contempt for Women (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 09:41:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Roberts Demonstrates Contempt for Women (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Roberts Demonstrates Contempt for Women  (Read 2039 times)
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« on: August 27, 2005, 04:25:30 PM »

"Some might question whether encouraging homemakers to become lawyers contributes to the common good."

some might.  You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a lawyer.  But hey, we can always use a few thousand more.

Let's see if we have this straight.  Roberts questions whether abandoning a child at home at enrolling in law school, of all things, "contributes to the common good."

I wouldn't know where to begin to pick apart your post.  Just let me know when the Philosophy Department assigns you to do the Logic & Syllogism 101 lecture.  I want to enroll in that one.  Should be interesting.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2005, 04:32:30 PM »

If we had more abortions, we'd be more economically sucessful.

and if we had more hammers, the school system would be much better.

See nclib, we're already practicing for your logic class. 
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2005, 05:42:09 PM »

whether you're laughing with me or at me is less important than the fact that you're amused, I'd imagine.  Sure, it's always an honor to be quoted. 
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2005, 08:14:06 PM »

If we had more abortions, we'd be more economically sucessful.

Honestly I have to wonder what the hell you're thinking.

My guess is that he feels a lower population would lead to more economic success.  Of course, under that view, immigration would have to be prohibited too, and sex would have to be regulated, which I doubt he supports.

oops.  I actually thought he was doing sardonism. 


Well, just in case it wasn't clear, I was.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 9 queries.