So at the end of the day Wulfric's fanatical opposition to Hillary was a product of him being sexist garbage. I'm actually somewhat surprised.
TLDR: She's too liberal for my tastes and for the moment there's still hope that republicans will nominate someone (fairly) moderate. But as I have said in the past: if the Republicans nominate Cruz, Carson, Walker, Santorum, Huckabee, etc., I will endorse and vote for Hillary.
You literally nodded along to a tweet implying that a) if you're a woman and your husband cheats, that's your fault because you couldn't "satisfy" him, and b) that a) represents such a failing on the woman's part that it literally disqualifies her from being a good President. Given this, and your fanatical latching onto the hot anti-Hillary sh**t of the month (
Lincoln Chafee - seriously? Though you aren't alone in this regard, I'll grant you that), makes me doubt there's any circumstance you'd consider voting for Hillary short of the GOP nominating Zombie Hitler with Attila the Hun as running mate.
Seriously. You can oppose a female candidate without nodding along as human garbage like Trump rant about how it's the woman's fault when her husband cheats because SHE DINT SATISFY HER MANLY MAN LIKE A GOOD WIMMINZ SHULD. I usually think IceSpear is wrong 95% of the time when he says people's opposition to Hillary has roots in sexism, but let's just say I wouldn't be surprised if this was an occasion where that 5% managed to fire.
