Should the US break off diplomatic relations with Russia? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 01:17:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Should the US break off diplomatic relations with Russia? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the US break off diplomatic relations with Russia?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Should the US break off diplomatic relations with Russia?  (Read 1442 times)
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« on: January 15, 2017, 04:36:02 PM »



Are you crazy?

Why?
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2017, 04:49:59 PM »



You live in the past. Russia is a friend and a future ally of the United States.

China is the real problem.


Can you list any dispute we have with Russia?
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2017, 05:01:25 PM »



You live in the past. Russia is a friend and a future ally of the United States.

China is the real problem.


Can you list any dispute we have with Russia?


Uh, Crimea, Eastern Ukraine, South Ossetia, and the Baltics.

Also it's hideous human rights records and disgusting anti-LGBT bigotry.


Crimea used to be Russian territory before it was transferred to Ukraine by order of Nikita Khrushchev.

The population of Eastern Ukraine is majority Russian. Are you suggesting Russia should abandon them? After all, the government in Ukraine is fiercely anti-Russian. Russia didn't touch Ukraine while pro-Russian governments were in power there.

South Ossetia is ethnic Russian territory as well.

Last I heard, Russia hasn't invaded any of the Baltic States.


Human rights records are none of our business. Russians are more conservative and traditional than the other European nations, on average. Throughout history, the form of government in Russia has always been authoritarian. At least they have democracy and elections. Their democracy may not be a liberal democracy, but it's still a democracy and democracies are always better than dictatorships.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,067
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2017, 05:26:42 PM »

Crimea used to be Russian territory before it was transferred to Ukraine by order of Nikita Khrushchev.

The population of Eastern Ukraine is majority Russian. Are you suggesting Russia should abandon them? After all, the government in Ukraine is fiercely anti-Russian. Russia didn't touch Ukraine while pro-Russian governments were in power there.

South Ossetia is ethnic Russian territory as well.

That's not the point.

The whole concept of peace and stability in Europe following WWII is based on respecting existing borders.


So, you are suggesting Russia should abandon the ethnic Russian population in bordering countries?

Perhaps a better solution would be to respect Russia and avoid provocations that could push Russia over the edge? Like, don't install anti-Russian governments in neighboring countries.

After all, Russian aggression is a desperate act of self-defense bordering on self-preservation. To realize that, all you need to do is look at the situation and developments from Russian perspective.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.