The absentee/early vote thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 10:37:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  The absentee/early vote thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 ... 86
Author Topic: The absentee/early vote thread  (Read 172953 times)
JimSharp
Rookie
**
Posts: 22
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1950 on: November 01, 2016, 01:52:54 PM »


I don't know enough to say if it is true or not, but some analysts have blamed the low AA turnout in NC on less (in some cases only 1) early vote locations 1st week and some hurricane displacement. Some Dems think rebound this week is possible/probably. dunno if accurate but early vote trends/patterns have likely been affected by shortened EV window that was reversed by court order.
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1951 on: November 01, 2016, 01:53:25 PM »

Nice! Thanks for the update on where the state stands right now, Trump has to have that one.

You're making the false assumption that all Whites will vote for Trump in the same way they did for Romney, especially in the case for White Republican women.

Agreed-- also, I think the main takeaway from these plots is the huge increase in UNA voting, which demographics and early polling suggest will break towards Clinton

(btw, please fix your quoting-- the "Nice" part isn't mine.)
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1952 on: November 01, 2016, 01:55:40 PM »

Oh actually this graph is better (from http://www.insight-us.org/blog/north-carolinas-early-voting-2016-dashboard/)


Nice! Thanks for the update on where the state stands right now, Trump has to have that one.

You're making the false assumption that all Whites will vote for Trump in the same way they did for Romney, especially in the case for White Republican women.

Polling seems mixed on this. New elon poll shows him up bigly among whites.

A poll that didn't weight for education, which is the primary divider in this demographic. Huge flaw.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1953 on: November 01, 2016, 02:05:21 PM »

Mark Murray ‏@mmurraypolitics  2m2 minutes ago
Comparing 2012 vs. 2016 in early vote by party affiliation -- one week out before election, via NBC/TargetSmart

Logged
riceowl
riceowl315
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,363


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1954 on: November 01, 2016, 02:08:18 PM »

What am I missing about that Georgia number? Because that shift is well insane.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1955 on: November 01, 2016, 02:09:54 PM »

"FL still tied", as Murray notes, but 40-40-19 in FL is probably a better look for Dems than 42-42-16. At any rate, this is handy to have all in one place.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1956 on: November 01, 2016, 02:10:49 PM »

why hasn't their been more conversations about Michigan Democrats just decimating Michigan Republicans this year?? Am i missing something?
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1957 on: November 01, 2016, 02:13:01 PM »

What am I missing about that Georgia number? Because that shift is well insane.

Hard to say, since I think the states with asterisks are derived from TargetSmart modeling since those states don't release party info about early voters.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1958 on: November 01, 2016, 02:15:34 PM »

are those numbers valid? do all those midwestern states have full early voting?

otherwise i can't understand why the dems should surge in WI and MI. (even absentee-kingdom PA lol)
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1959 on: November 01, 2016, 02:16:03 PM »

are those numbers valid? do all those midwestern states have full early voting?

otherwise i can't understand why the dems should surge in WI and MI. (even absentee-kingdom PA lol)

WI has full early voting going until 11/4.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1960 on: November 01, 2016, 02:16:29 PM »

What am I missing about that Georgia number? Because that shift is well insane.

https://public.tableau.com/profile/john8765#!/vizhome/2016EarlyVotingasof102216/Dashboard

These numbers are stale, but a week ago, it seems like very strong GOP turnout in North Georgia which favors Trump. Potentially leading to low election day turnout.

And as elsewhere nationally, Black share of vote is down.
Logged
swf541
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1961 on: November 01, 2016, 02:16:42 PM »

Some really great swings in VA and WI
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,034


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1962 on: November 01, 2016, 02:16:48 PM »

What am I missing about that Georgia number? Because that shift is well insane.

Hard to say, since I think the states with asterisks are derived from TargetSmart modeling since those states don't release party info about early voters.

It must be. VA doesn't even have registration by party.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1963 on: November 01, 2016, 02:16:59 PM »

are those numbers valid? do all those midwestern states have full early voting?

otherwise i can't understand why the dems should surge in WI and MI. (even absentee-kingdom PA lol)
No, PA has strict absentee voting, while Michigan has excused Absentee, and one of those excuses is being over I think 50.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,522
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1964 on: November 01, 2016, 02:17:42 PM »

Mark Murray ‏@mmurraypolitics  2m2 minutes ago
Comparing 2012 vs. 2016 in early vote by party affiliation -- one week out before election, via NBC/TargetSmart



Wow, good news for dems
Logged
Ozymandias
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 470


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1965 on: November 01, 2016, 02:18:16 PM »

why hasn't their been more conversations about Michigan Democrats just decimating Michigan Republicans this year?? Am i missing something?

Like GA, I believe this is a model result, not actual released data.
Logged
swf541
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1966 on: November 01, 2016, 02:19:35 PM »

why hasn't their been more conversations about Michigan Democrats just decimating Michigan Republicans this year?? Am i missing something?

Like GA, I believe this is a model result, not actual released data.

Ok, that makes  alot more sense now
Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,789
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1967 on: November 01, 2016, 02:20:00 PM »

why hasn't their been more conversations about Michigan Democrats just decimating Michigan Republicans this year?? Am i missing something?

if trump is going to have any chance of beating hillary in MI, he will have a big number of those D especially men voting for him. so it isn't a big deal this.
Logged
PresidentTRUMP
2016election
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1968 on: November 01, 2016, 02:29:43 PM »

why hasn't their been more conversations about Michigan Democrats just decimating Michigan Republicans this year?? Am i missing something?

if trump is going to have any chance of beating hillary in MI, he will have a big number of those D especially men voting for him. so it isn't a big deal this.

Agreed. Trump's only chance in Michigan is to win a ton of white blue collar male voters who always vote D but like Trumps message on trade for that state and bringing manufacturing jobs back. He would have to win a ton of those type of voters to squeak out a win there.

You would think his message would be ideal for a state like Michigan. Again the wild card will be does the AA vote significantly drop in cities like Detroit or not.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1969 on: November 01, 2016, 02:37:45 PM »

MI is in a better shape than usually thought and is less stereotypical midwest today.

OH is and stays ground-zero.

what makes me crazy is that we assume, MI union-voters want to double down on union-death.
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,993
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1970 on: November 01, 2016, 02:41:06 PM »

Mark Murray ‏@mmurraypolitics  2m2 minutes ago
Comparing 2012 vs. 2016 in early vote by party affiliation -- one week out before election, via NBC/TargetSmart



Wow, good news for dems

That looks really good, wow!
Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,993
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1971 on: November 01, 2016, 02:43:45 PM »

However, I would see if Obama could stay in FL for the remaining 6 days of campaigning. We need an African-American voter push and he's the man
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1972 on: November 01, 2016, 02:50:04 PM »

Jon Ralston ‏@RalstonReports  3m3 minutes ago
Turnout going to be low today in Clark, but maybe better than Mon. 5,600 had voted by 11. Was 4,500 on Mon. I bet Dems are nervous.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1973 on: November 01, 2016, 02:53:13 PM »

Jon Ralston ‏@RalstonReports  3m3 minutes ago
Turnout going to be low today in Clark, but maybe better than Mon. 5,600 had voted by 11. Was 4,500 on Mon. I bet Dems are nervous.

He's already said he banked on today being low, due to historic trends in EV there. He's not forecasting with that last phrase, he's trolling. That's not to say the numbers will or won't end up okay by week's end, but he's having fun right now.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1974 on: November 01, 2016, 02:55:36 PM »

Jon Ralston ‏@RalstonReports  3m3 minutes ago
Turnout going to be low today in Clark, but maybe better than Mon. 5,600 had voted by 11. Was 4,500 on Mon. I bet Dems are nervous.

He's already said he banked on today being low, due to historic trends in EV there. He's not forecasting with that last phrase, he's trolling. That's not to say the numbers will or won't end up okay by week's end, but he's having fun right now.

And it will work too.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80 81 82 83 84 ... 86  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 7 queries.