Which candidate from the other party would you most consider voting for?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 01:13:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Which candidate from the other party would you most consider voting for?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Which candidate from the other party would you most consider voting for?
#1
Hillary Clinton (Republican)
 
#2
Barack Hussein Obama (Republican)
 
#3
Al Gore (Republican)
 
#4
John Edwards (Republican)
 
#5
Bill Richardson (Republican)
 
#6
Joe Biden (Republican)
 
#7
Wes Clark (Republican)
 
#8
Other (Republican)
 
#9
Rudy Giuliani (Democrat)
 
#10
John McCain (Democrat)
 
#11
Mitt Romney (Democrat)
 
#12
Sam Brownback (Democrat)
 
#13
Mike Huckabee (Democrat)
 
#14
Other (Democrat)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: Which candidate from the other party would you most consider voting for?  (Read 2452 times)
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: December 17, 2006, 07:02:46 PM »

I would vote for Wes Clark over a lot of the people the GOP has on the table for 2008. I would vote for Richardson if a Brownback type character were to obtain the GOP nomination.
Logged
Saxwsylvania
Van Der Blub
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,534


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: December 17, 2006, 07:06:19 PM »

Bill Richardson, but most likely I'll be voting Constitution anyway

The constitution party needs to change its name, cause it only goes by the constitution when it suits their beliefs.

They never blatently neglect the constitution, they may just interpret it differently than you

There opposition to the Patriot Act really turns me off to them.


You're weird.  You're a Democrat who thinks the Constitution Party should change its name because it opposes the Patriot Act.

Weirdo.

I like Sam Brownback, he is just conservative enough w/o being too conservative for a blue dog like myself

Brownback's not too conservative for a blue dog like yourself?  How exactly do you define 'conservative', Down?  I mean . . . uh . . . Blue Dog.  Say, how many Blue Dog Democrats live in Vermont, anyway?  It must be pretty lonely up there.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,592
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: December 17, 2006, 08:36:05 PM »

Chuck Hagel.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,592
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: December 17, 2006, 08:41:27 PM »

Bill Richardson, but most likely I'll be voting Constitution anyway

The constitution party needs to change its name, cause it only goes by the constitution when it suits their beliefs.

They never blatently neglect the constitution, they may just interpret it differently than you

There opposition to the Patriot Act really turns me off to them.


Tha Patriot Act is unconstitutional.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,592
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: December 17, 2006, 08:43:42 PM »

I like Sam Brownback, he is just conservative enough w/o being too conservative for a blue dog like myself

Huh I think most blue dogs would disagree.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: December 18, 2006, 10:58:43 PM »

joe biden (not a shot of winning the nomination)
mark warner (not running)

hillary clinton (maybe)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.234 seconds with 16 queries.