New Hampshire 2008 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 06:35:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  New Hampshire 2008 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: New Hampshire 2008  (Read 2525 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW
« on: March 18, 2007, 08:48:39 AM »

I have a felling the state will go Republican in 08, Because NH doesn't like people like Hillary.

Its pretty much finished for the GOP.  Rudy and McCain might make it a tad more interesting, but even with them it won't be that close.  Romney no way.  The GOP has fallen so far and so fast in the state, and its basically done, cooked fried forget about it.  The state is VERY anti-Iraq, with that debacle very likely to be raging on during the time of the election, I think the GOP has virtually no shot in the state.  I really don't think the state will even be that close next year.

I have a feeling it will a surprise state in 2008.  Either the GOP will win or it will be WV of 2008

It could very well be the West Virginia of 2008.  I could see New Hampshire going Democratic by the comfortable margin of around 53%-45%. 
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2007, 05:27:10 PM »

it is a lean democrat state.

it isnt a lock for the democrats, particularly if the war is over or winding down by nov 08.

my biggest fear is that the republicans are going to write nh off (and the entire northeast, similar to what the democrats did in the south in the 90s)

The Democrats did not write off the South in the 1990s did they - Clinton carried Arkansas, Tennessee and Louisiana in both 1992 and 1996, and he carried Georgia in 1992 and Florida in 1996.  In 1996, he came close to winning North Carolina, Mississippi and Virginia.

The Democrats arguably started to right off the South after the 2000 elections - when Al Gore failed to carry even his homestate of Tennessee and lost Arkansas and Louisiana - two states he could feasibly have carried.  And the fact that AL-3, a District that the right Democrat could win in, remains in Republican hands, demonstrates that they have written off the South now.  But I do not think they did it in the 1990s - it really occurred after 2000 and especially in 2002 and 2004 - when the Republicans won every open seat up for election in the region and Bush convincingly won every Southern state. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.