So. What now? And when?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 13, 2024, 11:33:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  So. What now? And when?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: So. What now? And when?  (Read 2054 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,794
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 29, 2008, 01:42:53 PM »

With the defeat of the bailout, what's likely to happen now? And when?
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,216
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2008, 01:43:16 PM »

Another version of the bailout with some armtwisting. I'm just hoping it's not as bad of a package.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,907


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2008, 01:45:06 PM »

A rushed bill may actually be worse.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2008, 01:57:04 PM »


I think the biggest problem with the $700B was that it was too big and broad.  They need to pass a series of smaller bills.  For starters, it will be less politically dangerous for candidates running for office in close races (both dems and reps).  Secondly, the bills will be more focused on what they are suppose to do.  Lastly, the more contentious issues will be debated longer (such as long-term powers provided to the Sec of Tres) without holding up the needed funding in key areas.
Logged
ChrisFromNJ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,742


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -8.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2008, 02:34:52 PM »


I think the biggest problem with the $700B was that it was too big and broad.  They need to pass a series of smaller bills.  For starters, it will be less politically dangerous for candidates running for office in close races (both dems and reps).  Secondly, the bills will be more focused on what they are suppose to do.  Lastly, the more contentious issues will be debated longer (such as long-term powers provided to the Sec of Tres) without holding up the needed funding in key areas.

The bill voted on today had the Treasury receiving $200 billion initially and then receiving the other $500 billion after Congressional approval.

This bill was entirely reasonable.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2008, 02:41:37 PM »


I think the biggest problem with the $700B was that it was too big and broad.  They need to pass a series of smaller bills.  For starters, it will be less politically dangerous for candidates running for office in close races (both dems and reps).  Secondly, the bills will be more focused on what they are suppose to do.  Lastly, the more contentious issues will be debated longer (such as long-term powers provided to the Sec of Tres) without holding up the needed funding in key areas.

The bill voted on today had the Treasury receiving $200 billion initially and then receiving the other $500 billion after Congressional approval.

This bill was entirely reasonable.

No, because it was an omnibus bill that was too entangled in too many different aspects.  It needs to be broken up and passed in separate pieces. 
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,216
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2008, 02:47:51 PM »


I think the biggest problem with the $700B was that it was too big and broad.  They need to pass a series of smaller bills.  For starters, it will be less politically dangerous for candidates running for office in close races (both dems and reps).  Secondly, the bills will be more focused on what they are suppose to do.  Lastly, the more contentious issues will be debated longer (such as long-term powers provided to the Sec of Tres) without holding up the needed funding in key areas.

The bill voted on today had the Treasury receiving $200 billion initially and then receiving the other $500 billion after Congressional approval.

This bill was entirely reasonable.

No, because it was an omnibus bill that was too entangled in too many different aspects.  It needs to be broken up and passed in separate pieces. 

Your sig is interesting. So we're seeing a last minute rally.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,110


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2008, 02:53:22 PM »

They'll draft a new bill, but it won't be a for a few days as the Jewish people will be observing Rahshashana.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 29, 2008, 05:38:40 PM »

An amended bill, I'd assume.
Logged
ChrisFromNJ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,742


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -8.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2008, 05:48:37 PM »


I doubt the House GOP goes along with this bailout bill in its current form.

I would expect their version of the bill to be on the floor Thursday ready for an up or down vote.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2008, 06:12:18 PM »


I doubt the House GOP goes along with this bailout bill in its current form.

I would expect their version of the bill to be on the floor Thursday ready for an up or down vote.

I didn't necessarily mean this bill with changes - I meant a different bill, whether that's modeled after this one or just started from scratch.
Logged
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2008, 11:30:47 PM »

They'll draft a new bill, but it won't be a for a few days as the Jewish people will be observing Rahshashana.

It's only too appropriate that the bankers who caused this crisis are now celebrating the downfall of the American economy.
+1

Hopefully we'll get a bill that deals with the real root of this crisis; THE JEW!
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 29, 2008, 11:36:12 PM »


That's what they were trying to push through at first.
Logged
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 29, 2008, 11:42:15 PM »


That's what they were trying to push through at first.
I'm sure the fact that Chairman Paulson and co are affiliated with Goldman Sachs (and others) had nothing to do with it. No sir, no conflict of interest there at all. Go back to sleep, America.
Logged
ottermax
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,799
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.09

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 30, 2008, 12:03:50 AM »

They'll draft a new bill, but it won't be a for a few days as the Jewish people will be observing Rahshashana.

It's only too appropriate that the bankers who caused this crisis are now celebrating the downfall of the American economy.

If there was a crisis on Christmas Eve, Congress would still go on vacation. You're comment disgusts me.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.242 seconds with 12 queries.