Democratic Wild Western Tuesday results thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 08:29:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Wild Western Tuesday results thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16
Author Topic: Democratic Wild Western Tuesday results thread  (Read 28554 times)
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #350 on: March 23, 2016, 06:22:23 AM »

Hillary Clinton won one county in Idaho by one vote.

And Sanders was so close to cracking 80% in both. Ugh.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #351 on: March 23, 2016, 06:24:57 AM »

Hillary Clinton won one county in Idaho by one vote.

And Sanders was so close to cracking 80% in both. Ugh.

Still votes to count in Utah.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,976


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #352 on: March 23, 2016, 07:38:20 AM »

The error in the Dan Jones poll in ID (Sanders +2 vs Sanders +57) is almost as large as the Mason-Dixon poll (Clinton +34 vs Sanders +23) in MN. How are they even getting these 50+ point polling errors?

crap like this SHOULD be the nail in the coffin for these garbage pollsters, but alas they'll still putting out garbage in the future,

To be fair, Dan Jones is the only Utah-based pollster, so they're not going to go out of business anytime soon.

Probably because they're polling it as if it's a primary. In 2008, Hillary got 39% in the Utah primary. She also got 38% in the Idaho primary, while getting 17% in the caucus. Hence in retrospect you could have seen these states as very similar even then. For all the complaints about voting in Arizona, Utah switching to a caucus massively helped Bernie. These caucuses are basically just like giant rallies where you go with your friends. Overwhelming peer pressure.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #353 on: March 23, 2016, 07:53:17 AM »

The error in the Dan Jones poll in ID (Sanders +2 vs Sanders +57) is almost as large as the Mason-Dixon poll (Clinton +34 vs Sanders +23) in MN. How are they even getting these 50+ point polling errors?

crap like this SHOULD be the nail in the coffin for these garbage pollsters, but alas they'll still putting out garbage in the future,

To be fair, Dan Jones is the only Utah-based pollster, so they're not going to go out of business anytime soon.

Probably because they're polling it as if it's a primary. In 2008, Hillary got 39% in the Utah primary. She also got 38% in the Idaho primary, while getting 17% in the caucus. Hence in retrospect you could have seen these states as very similar even then. For all the complaints about voting in Arizona, Utah switching to a caucus massively helped Bernie. These caucuses are basically just like giant rallies where you go with your friends. Overwhelming peer pressure.

LOL I didn't hear any reports about peer pressure in Idaho or Utah, just about how many people supported Sanders Roll Eyes
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #354 on: March 23, 2016, 08:02:41 AM »

Wow, the delegates are looking pretty good for Bernie in Idaho and Utah. Idaho it turns out he probably wins 18-5, and Utah likely 27-6. That's a net of 34 delegates, and certainly well more than cancels out the 15 or so delegate loss in Arizona.

If getting about half of the net delegates you need to catch up with Hillary is a good night I don't want to know what a bad night would be.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #355 on: March 23, 2016, 08:11:43 AM »

Sanders looks to have a solid next 3 weeks ...
Logged
Ashley Biden's Diary
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,681
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #356 on: March 23, 2016, 08:20:27 AM »

Sanders looks to have a solid next 3 weeks ...

Which will all be negated by NY on the 19th...
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #357 on: March 23, 2016, 08:22:13 AM »

Sanders looks to have a solid next 3 weeks ...

Which will all be negated by NY on the 19th...

I know, but it will still be a nice 3 weeks ... Wink
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #358 on: March 23, 2016, 08:37:26 AM »

Sanders looks to have a solid next 3 weeks ...

Which will all be negated by NY on the 19th...

I know, but it will still be a nice 3 weeks ... Wink

About the same time that Hillary had 8 years ago too. OH, RI, TX (primary), PA... I remember Hills winning all of those... Didn't affect the scoreboard, but it did give those white working class dead-enders a few more weeks of hope. Sadly, they will get Berned again.

Lol puns
Logged
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #359 on: March 23, 2016, 08:39:10 AM »

Sanders looks to have a solid next 3 weeks ...

Which will all be negated by NY on the 19th...
I wouldn't be so quick to call NY for Hillary
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #360 on: March 23, 2016, 08:55:42 AM »

Sanders looks to have a solid next 3 weeks ...

Which will all be negated by NY on the 19th...
I wouldn't be so quick to call NY for Hillary

LOLwhat ?

Sanders might win a few counties in the North, but Clinton will easily win NYC and suburbs.

I would be surprised if she wins by less than 65-35.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #361 on: March 23, 2016, 09:52:34 AM »

I am hoping Bernie wins files a suit due to Arizona fraud - Under-staffing & so few polling areas, people standing in a line all night - A lot of people give provisional ballot because they ran out of ballots. They don't count provisional ballots.

I can understand that it being closed, many independents were turned away but how come many life long Democrats were turned away because they were surprisingly not registered.

I don't think it is a deliberate effort, but a massacre due to horrible incompetency.
Logged
Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort
Joshua
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #362 on: March 23, 2016, 09:59:11 AM »

I am hoping Bernie wins files a suit due to Arizona fraud - Under-staffing & so few polling areas, people standing in a line all night - A lot of people give provisional ballot because they ran out of ballots. They don't count provisional ballots.

I can understand that it being closed, many independents were turned away but how come many life long Democrats were turned away because they were surprisingly not registered.

I don't think it is a deliberate effort, but a massacre due to horrible incompetency.

He should sue Maricopa County. It'll be the only productive thing he's contributed to helping other progressives besides himself get elected.
Logged
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #363 on: March 23, 2016, 10:02:07 AM »

I am hoping Bernie wins files a suit due to Arizona fraud - Under-staffing & so few polling areas, people standing in a line all night - A lot of people give provisional ballot because they ran out of ballots. They don't count provisional ballots.

I can understand that it being closed, many independents were turned away but how come many life long Democrats were turned away because they were surprisingly not registered.

I don't think it is a deliberate effort, but a massacre due to horrible incompetency.
Now then, the issuance of provisional ballots may have limited the counted votes, but one would imagine that there wouldn't be such a significant discrepancy between the make-up of those early enough to receive actual ballots and those who had to do with the provisionals for there to be considerable impact on the delegate count. Their incompetence, intentional or not, may have negatively affected either candidate. And how Hillary seems to have foolishly assumed the nomination, one would also imagine she would not have been so rash as to have orchestrated such a risky maneuver.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #364 on: March 23, 2016, 10:09:46 AM »

I am hoping Bernie wins files a suit due to Arizona fraud - Under-staffing & so few polling areas, people standing in a line all night - A lot of people give provisional ballot because they ran out of ballots. They don't count provisional ballots.

I can understand that it being closed, many independents were turned away but how come many life long Democrats were turned away because they were surprisingly not registered.

I don't think it is a deliberate effort, but a massacre due to horrible incompetency.
Now then, the issuance of provisional ballots may have limited the counted votes, but one would imagine that there wouldn't be such a significant discrepancy between the make-up of those early enough to receive actual ballots and those who had to do with the provisionals for there to be considerable impact on the delegate count. Their incompetence, intentional or not, may have negatively affected either candidate. And how Hillary seems to have foolishly assumed the nomination, one would also imagine she would not have been so rash as to have orchestrated such a risky maneuver.

I am no saying it has decided a victory or not - But it could have had a big difference in % or somewhat which changes the delegate math.

Clinton won because she swept the early voting - If you consider election day results Sanders won in  most counties - Otherwise he would be worse.

I have heard complains from plenty of Bernie supporters - I am not saying Clinton people were not likely to be affected, they were & Bernie's people got more affected.

Either way it is unfair on both candidates, it's BS & he needs to push it to ensure this nonsense is not getting repeated
Logged
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #365 on: March 23, 2016, 10:29:01 AM »

I am no saying it has decided a victory or not - But it could have had a big difference in % or somewhat which changes the delegate math.

Clinton won because she swept the early voting - If you consider election day results Sanders won in  most counties - Otherwise he would be worse.

I have heard complains from plenty of Bernie supporters - I am not saying Clinton people were not likely to be affected, they were & Bernie's people got more affected.

Either way it is unfair on both candidates, it's BS & he needs to push it to ensure this nonsense is not getting repeated
I see. Considerably more upset now :/
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #366 on: March 23, 2016, 11:11:11 AM »

Clinton won Arizona by 18 points. There's no way Sanders won the election day vote.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,810


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #367 on: March 23, 2016, 11:14:25 AM »

Clinton won Arizona by 18 points. There's no way Sanders won the election day vote.

I wouldn't be so sure about that. Sanders is winning 60.3% of the election day vote in Maricopa County. Thing is that 85% of the votes there so far are early votes.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,586
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #368 on: March 23, 2016, 11:18:20 AM »

Wow, Clinton lost by a bigger margin than anyone expected in Utah and Idaho. I guess the whole caucus process helped Sanders.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,190
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #369 on: March 23, 2016, 12:29:45 PM »

In 3 weeks, the pledged delegate count could be roughly 1.300 Clinton and 1.100 Sanders.

Sanders could close the gap by about 60-100 delegates in the next contests (winning ca. 185 out of the 290 delegates).

It would then be 54% Clinton and 46% Sanders among pledged delegates.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,765
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #370 on: March 23, 2016, 12:35:49 PM »

...and then any gains made are wiped out by New York, Maryland and Pennsylvania a few weeks later.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #371 on: March 23, 2016, 12:42:04 PM »

...and then any gains made are wiped out by New York, Maryland and Pennsylvania a few weeks later.

Maryland would be bad but NY & PA won't be a blow-out - Sanders will post decent numbers in NY. PA could well be a Sanders win (Strong demographics for Sanders - 80% White, around 4-5% less black than say in Illinois where he tied almost, lesser hispanics). The close process hurts but neither is NY or PA will be a blow-out (MD on the other hand has a higher black population than SC & Alabama)!
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #372 on: March 23, 2016, 12:57:48 PM »

If Bernie couldn't win an open primary in OH, it's very unlikely he'd win a closed primary in PA.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #373 on: March 23, 2016, 01:24:25 PM »

Hillary really cleaned up with the Native American vote. She crushed it in Apache and Navajo. I actually expected Sanders to do well with them.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,540
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #374 on: March 23, 2016, 01:32:03 PM »

If Bernie couldn't win an open primary in OH, it's very unlikely he'd win a closed primary in PA.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Will be interesting to see what happens in Western PA.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 10 queries.