CT-PPP: Malloy +8 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 10:50:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  CT-PPP: Malloy +8 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CT-PPP: Malloy +8  (Read 5173 times)
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« on: October 06, 2014, 07:56:33 PM »


Not for the allegedly unhappy CT voters who won't see any change ... States that become too partisan one way or the other ---> bad news, IMO.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2014, 11:08:03 PM »


Not for the allegedly unhappy CT voters who won't see any change ... States that become too partisan one way or the other ---> bad news, IMO.

It's a good thing it is those same CT voters who will make this choice.

You people talk as if Quinn and Malloy are about to be forced on the voters against their will.

No, more suggesting that a significant enough bloc of voters in reliably red or reliably blue states have gotten so caught up in national politics/RNC and DNC gimmick campaigning that they simply won't even vote for any member of the "other party," even if it's a well-qualified and moderate local candidate who they might have had no qualms with sending to DC or the governor's mansion even ten years ago.

And, at the end of the day, whether that's CT no longer voting for ANY Republican just because of their grievances with the national GOP or Alabama no longer voting for ANY Democrat just because of their grievances with the national Dems, I think it's sad and bad for politics.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.