Would the Wyoming rule be a good idea? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 05, 2024, 09:23:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Would the Wyoming rule be a good idea? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would the Wyoming rule be a good idea?  (Read 522 times)
OBD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,570
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -6.26

« on: October 21, 2020, 12:43:39 AM »

Small seats makes gerrymandering harder. Logically, it makes sense - the less population in a district, the less leeway the ruling party has to draw it to be favorable to themselves. For an extreme example, a 400-seat map of Oregon that I drew nearly perfectly represented the electorate, as effectively gerrymandering was basically impossible. However, I do concur that the difference between the current House and the Wyoming Rule house will not make gerrymandering significantly more difficult.

I do support this, though. We need to make Congress more representative of the general population, instead of disproportionate rural overrepresentation.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.