From a quick read I think the bill would be ok as it is. There is no funding attached nor is there a need to calculate anything (for the 2022 budget, I'd simply claim that there are no drug addicts in Atlasia and therefore funding for this bill would be 0$ 
).
What is the point in that case?
I do not understand the question?
A program with no funding I mean.
Ah ok I got it now. Well it's basically a tradeoff when doing the budget, where I tend to favour having a wrong budget over no budget. The more bills you have to research and cost, the longer it takes to create a budget
This goes doubly so when you can't rely on the Comptroller General like we've been unable to for a long time. So any bill you can cut, even if it is under very wrong reasons, is one less bill to cost.
You can also think of it if you want as creating a program, then immediately defunding it if you prefer to think of that approach.
Of course, if we want to give this a "fixed" sum of money, that is an amendment that can easily be done and would be easily doable (and easy to take into the budget when the time comes). Then the question becomes what is the appropiate amount of money to give to this.
