'Machine Made' campaign ads at UMP (France)

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

http://teleobs.nouvelobs.com/rubriques/vite-vu/articles/l-ump-utilise-des-images-americaines-pour-sa-campagne

It speaks about the fact that the latest campaign ads of UMP, outside of the fact that they are highly demagogic, are made thanks to an American data base of video images. In short the France that they sell us, is just random American pictures. What a joke.

I discovered a practice i didn't know. Though, not much surprised now when I come to think about it, but when you hear it, it's always "oh, no......."

I think you can understand the video without getting the comment.

I found this 'Petit Journal' of Canal+ a bit dumb a few years ago, but for one year now, I find them more and more good and necessary.

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Yes, the Petit Journal became really pretty good.

With Les Guignols and Guillon they are the necessary and good sarcasm of France for me.

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

I agree of course, c'est lamentable.
Rather deeply stupid than outrageous though, because political propaganda is, per se, sh**t, even with French images...

What I would want to know is how Barthès and the people who work for him have found this.
Randomly, it's possible.
Or just because a copéiste has given them the source.

That's how now our medias, even the critical ones, work.
As a side note, this is even more saddening for me.

And the developing story on DSK threatening Sarkozy in the toilets of G20 summit brings the same problem.
It seems as if Frédéric Lefebvre was ready to give photos on sexual activities of DSK. That's properly disgusting. And what is even worse is that some "journalists" would be happy to take them.

Seems that Barthès has a pretty team who likes searching all what concerns video images. Yay Petit Journal!

Though, yes, you never know from where it can come.

I haven't heard about that DSK affair.

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Haha...

Dear...

Well, several questions, 1st, the one of the 1st comment on the page, from where a journalist got the info about that 'closet meeting'? And then, is that really an info? And then, do UMPers effectively have some 'affairs' on DSK?

Anyways, if effectively this had to be accurate, that wouldn't really surprise me from UMPers Lefevre style has never been really glorious, would Sarkozy support such an operation? Dunno, I could imagine it possible too.

Anyways, if that are just 'date affairs' even inside his job, French don't care much about that stuffs, we're not in US, we're still rather amused by this, well we've got a bit the US influence, but not so so much I think, not yet.

Anyways too, well, I don't know who I would have to blame here (journalists if that's a fake rumor, or politicians if that's actual) but I'm not a fan of to see such things in regular papers...

[Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]]

Haha, Plenel, damn.........

Well yes, that may be Gatégno that made the paper, but I think it's not that much illegitimate for it to be here if that's an accurate story. Would show the very low nastiness of the political stage, and people who would be to blame here are politicians and not journalists. It is a problem that it is here if that's a fake, if this toilet story is only rumor, because yes, who and how someone got that info.

And in both cases, even in the case that could be legitimate to be  here, I don't like it to be in papers.