Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 11:07:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)  (Read 71282 times)
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


« on: November 21, 2016, 02:30:02 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

If you agree there shouldn't be campaigning in the election thread, you should agree with the invalidation of the ballot. Open and shut.

In reality, you *don't* agree with the campaigning ban.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Non sequitor.

Pretty much every jurisdiction has a ban on campaigning in the ballot box. Arguing a hypothetical does nothing to address the point. As you said, you agree with the ban on campaigning. The ban is in place for a good reason. That thread needs to be kept clean so as to make counting easier.

Pretty much every jurisdiction has laws regulating the format that ballots must follow, and there's a whole series of regulations - including invalidation for altering your ballot, etc.

Are you suggesting those regulations are also unconstitutional? Or do you not care about those because they won't help labor this election?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 8 queries.