How many reported posts/moderated posts/infraction points do you have?

[Rowan]

Reported Posts: 3
Moderated Posts: 0
Infraction Points: 0

I'm surprised it's that low.

[Joe Republic]

Reported Posts:     9
Moderated Posts:    2
Infraction Points:    0

I moderated one of those two posts myself, strangely enough.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Looks like I got a post moderated for accusing politicaladdict of wanting to rape fat women. Huh.

Also one of my anti-Mormon posts was deemed "trolling". I suppose Jesus Christ would be considered a troll if He was on the internet today.

[Deldem]

Reported Posts:     1
Moderated Posts:    1
Infraction Points:    0

I made a comment about Derek that was apparently too excessive.

[Eraserhead]

Looks like I got a post moderated for accusing politicaladdict of wanting to rape fat women. Huh.

Also one of my anti-Mormon posts was deemed "trolling". I suppose Jesus Christ would be considered a troll if He was on the internet today.

Of course he would be and that's a good thing.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Ooh, got another!

Reported Posts:     129
Moderated Posts:    56
Infraction Points:    0

[Jensen]

Zero across the board... I usually maintain a mature composure, online and offline.

[Meeker]

It should be pretty easy for a lot of us to figure out who reported our posts from now on if you check your stats on a daily basis. For instance, when I made a post this morning in this thread correcting which of my posts had been moderated I had six reported posts. Since that time I've made only one new post which was about Libertas' fetish of Rand Paul. Lo and behold, I now have seven reported posts! Who could've reported that post?!?

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

It should be pretty easy for a lot of us to figure out who reported our posts from now on if you check your stats on a daily basis. For instance, when I made a post this morning in this thread correcting which of my posts had been moderated I had six reported posts. Since that time I've made only one new post which was about Libertas' fetish of Rand Paul. Lo and behold, I now have seven reported posts! Who could've reported that post?!?

As if the rudeness weren't enough, now you're throwing around false accusations, Meek?

[Joe Republic]

It should be pretty easy for a lot of us to figure out who reported our posts from now on if you check your stats on a daily basis. For instance, when I made a post this morning in this thread correcting which of my posts had been moderated I had six reported posts. Since that time I've made only one new post which was about Libertas' fetish of Rand Paul. Lo and behold, I now have seven reported posts! Who could've reported that post?!?

I was extremely surprised to find that it actually wasn't Libertas for once.

[Eraserhead]

You can now see your moderated stuff when you click on the number of moderated posts.

[Teddy (IDS Legislator)]

Reported Posts:   1
Moderated Posts:   0
Infraction Points:   0

whoo hoo! someone reported one of my posts!

I wonder which one?

Maybe it was the one when you said that the forum was giving you nightmares about going to jail.

Not certain how that'd be report worthy I have nightmares about all sorts of strange things.

For the record, last night, I had a nightmare that they had an evil plan, and built apartment buildings that were facing the sun all day every day, the sun was huge and red and hot, and they would use this to burn people's eyes.

Never said my nightmares made sense

[Antonio the Sixth]

I actually noticed that I had 6 posts reported and 1 moderated, but Lunar told me it was due to a bug. so I still have a virgin criminal record.

[k-onmmunist]

PiT even more to the point of getting him banned?

Wishful thinking.

[k-onmmunist]

I got 6 reported for when I made 'personal attacks' and one for spam. Just because I posted an image into response to something. To be honest, I deserved all but the spam one.

[Lunar]

I got 6 reported for when I made 'personal attacks' and one for spam. Just because I posted an image into response to something. To be honest, I deserved all but the spam one.

In the future, feel free to contact moderators about ones don't understand -- we'll either be able to explain it or rescind it supposing you're polite and whatot

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Yeah, I thought I was being factually correct when I called Joe Republic an ass...... 

[President Mitt]

PiT even more to the point of getting him banned?

Wishful thinking.

[Хahar 🤔]

Reported posts: 8
Moderated posts: 4
Infraction points: 0

[King]

My moderated posts were lame.

One deleted in the cinyc opinion thread. And one edited because I was impersonating Alcon.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Ah, two more in the meantime...

Reported Posts:     131
Moderated Posts:    53
Infraction Points:    0


Wonder who's responsible?

[Lunar]

Two more reports, right, not moderated posts?  Too lazy to look up the previous number.

edit: It seems like you have had three reports recently, one where the moderated deleted the post but didn't give any "points," and two where the moderators involved haven't made a decision, but I'd be personally rather surprised if they were anything but "no infraction."  So it should be +3?

My moderated posts were lame.

One deleted in the cinyc opinion thread. And one edited because I was impersonating Alcon.

Alas, such is the case for our normal posters, that some quick judgment calls we made, which never had much of a chance of getting to light [a "warning"] with the previous system, get viewed with such seriousness.

Anyway, as I've said a lot, going forward, y'all should feel free to politely contact a moderator if you feel any of those judgment calls were too silly, and we'll review it and rescind/justify it.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Two more reports, right, not moderated posts?  Too lazy to look up the previous number.

edit: It seems like you have had three reports recently, one where the moderated deleted the post but didn't give any "points," and two where the moderators involved haven't made a decision, but I'd be personally rather surprised if they were anything but "no infraction."  So it should be +3?

My moderated posts were lame.

One deleted in the cinyc opinion thread. And one edited because I was impersonating Alcon.

Alas, such is the case for our normal posters, that some quick judgment calls we made, which never had much of a chance of getting to light [a "warning"] with the previous system, get viewed with such seriousness.

Anyway, as I've said a lot, going forward, y'all should feel free to politely contact a moderator if you feel any of those judgment calls were too silly, and we'll review it and rescind/justify it.

WTF, now we're having posts deleted for expressing "inappropriate" political views?

(Not directed at you, just a general concern)

[Lunar]

There's no policy of deletion for political views [obviously].  Just because something was marked "inappropriate" doesn't mean it was a political decision, fwiw [and it was marked with infinitely less points than calling someone a "moron" would get, that is to say, 0].  

But, as I haven't taken the time to form an opinion on the post, I wouldn't want to speak too much about it or ramble too much.

Shrug.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

There's no policy of deletion for political views [obviously].  Just because something was marked "inappropriate" doesn't mean it was a political decision, fwiw [and it was marked with infinitely less points than calling someone a "moron" would get, that is to say, 0].  

But, as I haven't taken the time to form an opinion on the post, I wouldn't want to speak too much about it or ramble too much.

Shrug.

Well apparently implying that the CIA and Mossad are terrorist groups was considered "Inappropriate" enough for a moderator to delete my post, despite the fact that their acts of terror are becoming increasingly well-known.


Seriously, what kind of juvenile would even report that post? As far as I can see, we've officially crossed the threshold into censoring political speech on a political forum.