PA Gubernatorial Race 2006 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 04:25:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  PA Gubernatorial Race 2006 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA Gubernatorial Race 2006  (Read 94310 times)
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« on: July 05, 2006, 07:15:59 PM »

Isn't there a good GOP candidate with experience who can take on Rendell and win?

Nope
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2006, 07:28:40 PM »

Isn't there a good GOP candidate with experience who can take on Rendell and win?

Nope

Well, there is one.  His name is Tom Ridge.  And personally, that's the race I really wanted to see.

But he isn't running and neither is Schweiker. They are the only two GOPers who had a chance.
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2006, 07:32:55 PM »

Isn't there a good GOP candidate with experience who can take on Rendell and win?

Nope

Well, there is one.  His name is Tom Ridge.  And personally, that's the race I really wanted to see.

But he isn't running and neither is Schweiker. They are the only two GOPers who had a chance.

Well, if Schweiker has run in '02, Rendell would still be the corrupt asshole mayor of Philadelphia.

Instead of the corrupt asshole governor of Pennsylvania? Smiley
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2006, 07:45:52 PM »


Santorum is just a petty little ankle bitting cock knocker. 


You must be aware that Keystone Phil left for Italy today! GREAT line!! Smiley
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2006, 07:19:00 PM »

To answer an earlier post, Swann hosted a version of "To Tell The Truth" around 1990-91.  Alex Trebek later took over when Swann proved totally awful.  This, combined with carrying a pigskin, qualifies him to be the governor of a major eastern industrial state?

Just who says we're industrial?
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #5 on: July 11, 2006, 07:24:03 PM »

Can someone - anyone - tell my why they support Swann without mentioning his football career? Where does he stand on the issues? Why is he evidently the most qualified GOP candidate to head the state?

Good questions. There are no easy answers. But let me tell you about his football career... Smiley
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2006, 05:51:05 PM »

Gee, let's just bump this little puppy... no news... Rendell ahead by biblical proportions... Swann, well not doing much... Diamond not qualifying for the ballot (yawn)... great race.
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2006, 08:55:04 AM »
« Edited: July 31, 2006, 10:33:19 AM by NewFederalist »

Gee, let's just bump this little puppy... no news... Rendell ahead by biblical proportions... Swann, well not doing much... Diamond not qualifying for the ballot (yawn)... great race.

If Diamond didn't qualify, who are you going to vote for, NewFeddy?

I really don't know. I want to see the results of the lawsuit (a decision from the 3rd Circuit is expected anytime) that would put the Libertarians, Constitutionalists and Greens on the ballot without any signatures required and also see if the Greens qualified anyway via petition. After that I will get serious about how to cast my vote.
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #8 on: August 01, 2006, 07:29:58 AM »

It doesn't matter anyway since Diamond has taken himself out of the race.

Rumor has it if the 3rd Circuit rules in favor of the "qualified" minor parties (Greens, Libertarians and Constitutionalists) then Diamond will be offered the Libertarian nomination as a "replacement" candidate. The LP only had a stand in for the purposes of their petition. I guess that was probably the plan all along.
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2006, 11:13:18 AM »

It doesn't matter anyway since Diamond has taken himself out of the race.

Rumor has it if the 3rd Circuit rules in favor of the "qualified" minor parties (Greens, Libertarians and Constitutionalists) then Diamond will be offered the Libertarian nomination as a "replacement" candidate. The LP only had a stand in for the purposes of their petition. I guess that was probably the plan all along.

Is that likely?

The person who said this is credible. In fact, the Libertarians planned all along to nominate him or endorse him from what I was told. Now the only question is will the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals allow the Libertarians a place on the ballot. That decision is due anytime.
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2006, 06:31:06 AM »

As of now, the only third party candidate to qualify for the ballot in the Gubernatorial race is the Green party's Marykay Rogers.

I understand the Democrats are challenging the Greens' petitions. A credible source tells me the validity rate may not be high enough to certify the 67,000+ that are required. Rendell and Swann may have the field to themselves unless the 3rd Circuit decides otherwise.
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2006, 06:54:52 PM »

Pennsylvania's election laws really suck. The two dominant political parties designed them to keep the game all to themselves. Very nice.
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2006, 08:56:56 PM »

Pennsylvania's election laws really suck. The two dominant political parties designed them to keep the game all to themselves. Very nice.

But there are many factions within the parties; that helps make up for things.

I suppose the same could be said for the pre-1964 days in the South when there were just different factions of Democrats.
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2006, 03:10:33 PM »

Well, the 3rd Circuit and the State Supreme Court effectively ended any alternative candidate participation in statewide races this year. It would appear Iraqi elections are more fair than Pennsylvania. Very nice... very nice indeed. (See http://www.ballot-access.org for details)
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2006, 04:31:09 AM »

Well, the 3rd Circuit and the State Supreme Court effectively ended any alternative candidate participation in statewide races this year. It would appear Iraqi elections are more fair than Pennsylvania. Very nice... very nice indeed. (See http://www.ballot-access.org for details)

Just go with Swann, Feddy. Eddie is going to have a comfortable win so you better not give him anymore than he needs.

If I vote at all, I probably would just vote against incumbents.
Logged
NewFederalist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,143
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -2.26

« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2006, 01:54:12 PM »

Another generic Swann ad out there about property taxes. I just saw it for the second time within three minutes. I feel bad for him.  Sad

Voting for Swann is a lot like voting for minor party nominees... you get to vote for a sure loser who isn't qualified anyway and is just a bit embarrassing! Go Lynn! Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 10 queries.