There was no "conservatism" in the early United States. What there was was Toryism, which was associated with having opposed the Revolution and which, while clearly on the right, cut across groups that would today be viewed as all over the place on the scale of socioeconomic advantage. Inasmuch as seeking to conserve political and economic forms inherited from Britain (or replicate forms present in Britain) could be seen as "conservative", Hamilton was obviously more conservative than noted Reign of Terror apologist Jefferson, and he was indisputably reactionary and elitist regardless.
In Jefferson's America, an ideology based on urbanism, government bureaucracy, and the working class would be unfathomable; in Hamilton's America, it would be the natural left pole of national policy. And, indeed, it is.
In Hamilton's America the working class would never have gained the right to vote, and so such ideology would never stand an even remote chance.
It's hard to see how any of the framers or founders would want the working class (or at least racial minorities and women) to get the right to vote.
In Hamilton's America, you'd probably see a unitary state with an urban political class and a hereditary upper house, somewhat similar to the House of Lords with appointments. We see reflections of this with the electoral college and the general distrust in democracy that was present among Federalists. Suffrage would likely remain in the hands of property holding men, at least until reforms were enacted to change voting rights. Slavery would be illegal and it's likely agrarian interests would be diminished in their capacity, alongside rural ones as well.
In Jefferson's America, there would be a lot less power concentrated in the Federal government, an almost nonexistent army, and a consensus around an agrarian republic. There would be no central banking or really any regulations on banking entirely, and states would pay their own debts as they incurred them. Slavery would likely continue to exist and the cities would receive little influence on the affairs of surrounding communities. In addition, voting rights would probably be extended to white men that did not own land, but not beyond that. The upperhouse would likely be elected and be based around population, with slaves included as a whole person for representation purposes.
Both sides have their failings and it's important to note that both are extremely outdated. There's little one can find comforting about either. In the case of Hamilton's, a unitary state without a Bill of Rights is pretty terrifying in a modern context. Jefferson's America, if he had stayed true to his principles, would probably be a rural backwater with even worse divides between states, and cities that were never fully developed. States would have large conflicts and the US would remain
these United States.
Poll
